OpenVisionScience: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
''11:30 Topic 2:'' Publishing, closed access, open access, Elsevier, corporate megapublishers and alternatives, <br> | ''11:30 Topic 2:'' Publishing, closed access, open access, Elsevier, corporate megapublishers and alternatives, <br> | ||
Add something here or discuss at the | Add something here or discuss at the [http://groups.google.com/group/publishPerceptionAttention Discussion Forum]. | ||
Revision as of 02:10, 15 February 2012
<owwmenu font="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" bold="1" color="black" bgcolor="white" hovercolor="black" bghovercolor="gray" topFontSize="10" fontSize="8" image="Image:OVSlogo2.png" > DiscussionForum=http://groups.google.com/group/publishPerceptionAttention </owwmenu>
Location: XXX Ballroom. This is not an official part of the VSS meeting, but it has the same unofficial status as the other satellites.
We all hope for an open system of science in which: 1. Journal articles are inexpensive or free. 2. Peer review is fair and efficient. 3. Experiments can be fully replicated by anyone.
Achieving these goals is more feasible than ever, but most publishers, journals, and researchers have made few changes to the way they do business. This workshop will include discussion of possible solutions.
We want constructive suggestions, possibly leading to an action plan.
Background
Problems
- Amusing video Scientist Meets Publisher satirizes the current situation with closed journal publishing
Possible Solutions
Agenda
11 a.m. start Introduction to the issues by Alex Holcombe and .
11:20 Topic 1: Experiment code repository, open peer review,
11:30 Topic 2: Publishing, closed access, open access, Elsevier, corporate megapublishers and alternatives,
Add something here or discuss at the Discussion Forum.
