OpenWetWare:Feature list/Lab notebook/2007 Oct Brainstorming/Cameron: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2006/12/including-smiles-cml-and-inchi-in.html
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2006/12/including-smiles-cml-and-inchi-in.html
http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2007/06/inchimatic-chemspider-and-usefulchem.html
http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2007/06/inchimatic-chemspider-and-usefulchem.html
*For biology it is less clear how to go about this - do we just need to adopt something? How do I say 'This post is about the enzyme Sortase'?
*For biology it is less clear how to go about this - do we just need to adopt something? How do I say 'This post is about the enzyme Sortase' or 'I can ligate proteins to DNA'?
*This is important not just for machine reasoning but how people will find the lab books they want on Google. Jean-Claude Bradley has discussed how people find UsefulChem through Google based in InChi searches (see link above for e.g.).
*This is important not just for machine reasoning but how people will find the lab books they want on Google. Jean-Claude Bradley has discussed how people find UsefulChem through Google based in InChi searches (see link above for e.g.).

Revision as of 01:48, 4 October 2007

Intro

General thoughts

  • Very important to articulate what you want to achieve. Is this just an electronic version of a paper notebook? Do you want it to link materials, protocols, data etc? DO you want it to be machine readable? Should it be just a record of what happened or a polished description of the experiment?
  • A lot of the differences between USefulChem and Southampton Lab Blog arise from what the original motivations were. Think about whether you want to go down one route or the other or to try and encompass both.
  • Try to build something that works even if someone doesn't use it properly. If it breaks as soon as someone can't do something they'll walk away.
  • Expect it to take some time to figure out what 'properly' is, we are still working on it
  • Build in tools that encourage people to use it 'properly'. e.g toolbars that provide easy access to links to other posts, or insertion of metadata, drag and drop, or one button upload, of data (not just images!) is very important
  • Provide templates, ideally make them part of the way the system works, provides consistency and ease of use
  • Being able to clone a post is very useful
  • Feel free to play in our sandpit, just pick an arbitrary 'sandpit group' name http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blog/blogs.php/blog_id/15 You can register for an account at; http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/ and then email me to sort out the access

Handling Metadata

  • If the system is to be powerful it must include capture of metadata. Our system has gone through several stages where we have changed the metadata that we record and the way we categorise things.
  • Simple tagging may be enough but can lead to confusion, we have developed categories of post, and then divide materials and procedures into more or less arbitrary categories.
  • For chemistry there has been much good discussion on the best way to identify compounds see;

http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2006/12/including-smiles-cml-and-inchi-in.html http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2007/06/inchimatic-chemspider-and-usefulchem.html

  • For biology it is less clear how to go about this - do we just need to adopt something? How do I say 'This post is about the enzyme Sortase' or 'I can ligate proteins to DNA'?
  • This is important not just for machine reasoning but how people will find the lab books they want on Google. Jean-Claude Bradley has discussed how people find UsefulChem through Google based in InChi searches (see link above for e.g.).