OpenWetWare:Information management/Standard protocol submission/Meeting - 7/6/06: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Time/Location/Objective== | |||
*Time: 12-1 EST, 7/6/06 | |||
*Location: 32-262 (Stata Center) | |||
We will be discussing ways to standardize protocol submission to be easily submit-able, read-able, and search-able on OWW. Notes and discussion pages will be updated post-meeting --feel free to provide your input on upcoming discussions! | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
===Template=== | |||
*Template needs to: | |||
**Provide Background | |||
**Collect different versions of a given protocol | |||
**Allow for comparison of those versions | |||
**Provide some sort of forum for discussion/comments/questions (see below) | |||
*Suggested Template | |||
**Multiple templates for flexibility or maybe several sub-templates so you can pick-and-choose? | |||
*Template Includes (searchable Keywords possible?) | |||
*User Friendly (Can we make this template easy to follow?) | |||
*Print Friendly | |||
'''Aggregation''' | |||
*How do we optimize the process/format to maximize the number of protocols we can get. | |||
'''User Input''' | |||
*We need a way for users to comment on protocols as well as ask questions, get debugging help, and have discussions. | |||
*We want these discussions to be archived and searchable. | |||
*Is the wiki the best format? | |||
**It may be cumbersome when the discussion gets large | |||
===Categorize/Tag=== | |||
*Tutorial on categorizing and tagging | |||
*How can we best categorize each protocol? | |||
**'''[[User:Rshetty|RS]] 15:15, 7 July 2006 (EDT)''': See [[OpenWetWare:Software/Ideas#Tags]] for my take on how we should use categories. | |||
===Terminology=== | |||
*How do we standardize terminology for easy understanding? | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<font color=red> Please add/edit notes as you wish. My laptop died in the middle of the meeting, so this is what I came up with so far. --[[User:Jennyn|Jennyn]]</font><br> | |||
*For the timebeing, we will use the Show/Hide tags to comment on particular protocol steps. | |||
*Possible Template Example: | |||
**DNA Ligation | |||
**Overview | |||
**Specific Protocols (list of protocols from labs including a general editable protocol) | |||
**Notes/Discussion | |||
*Specific Protocols link to individual namespace? | |||
*Choose one section for testing (in vitro DNA section for test) | |||
*Categorizing and tagging | |||
*Getting Started for Protocols to help users get started? | |||
*List Categories on front page | |||
*Possible index of ENTIRE protocols list for users who want to use Find function. | |||
**Must have everything categorized! | |||
==Action List== | |||
*Categorize all protocols ([[user:jennyn|Jenny]]) | |||
*Reformat ''in vitro'' DNA section ([[user:jennyn|Jenny]]) | |||
*Categorize tutorial ([[user:jgritton|Jeff]]) | |||
*Symantic wiki ([[user:ilya|Ilya]]) |
Latest revision as of 12:15, 7 July 2006
Time/Location/Objective
- Time: 12-1 EST, 7/6/06
- Location: 32-262 (Stata Center)
We will be discussing ways to standardize protocol submission to be easily submit-able, read-able, and search-able on OWW. Notes and discussion pages will be updated post-meeting --feel free to provide your input on upcoming discussions!
Agenda
Template
- Template needs to:
- Provide Background
- Collect different versions of a given protocol
- Allow for comparison of those versions
- Provide some sort of forum for discussion/comments/questions (see below)
- Suggested Template
- Multiple templates for flexibility or maybe several sub-templates so you can pick-and-choose?
- Template Includes (searchable Keywords possible?)
- User Friendly (Can we make this template easy to follow?)
- Print Friendly
Aggregation
- How do we optimize the process/format to maximize the number of protocols we can get.
User Input
- We need a way for users to comment on protocols as well as ask questions, get debugging help, and have discussions.
- We want these discussions to be archived and searchable.
- Is the wiki the best format?
- It may be cumbersome when the discussion gets large
Categorize/Tag
- Tutorial on categorizing and tagging
- How can we best categorize each protocol?
- RS 15:15, 7 July 2006 (EDT): See OpenWetWare:Software/Ideas#Tags for my take on how we should use categories.
Terminology
- How do we standardize terminology for easy understanding?
Notes
Please add/edit notes as you wish. My laptop died in the middle of the meeting, so this is what I came up with so far. --Jennyn
- For the timebeing, we will use the Show/Hide tags to comment on particular protocol steps.
- Possible Template Example:
- DNA Ligation
- Overview
- Specific Protocols (list of protocols from labs including a general editable protocol)
- Notes/Discussion
- Specific Protocols link to individual namespace?
- Choose one section for testing (in vitro DNA section for test)
- Categorizing and tagging
- Getting Started for Protocols to help users get started?
- List Categories on front page
- Possible index of ENTIRE protocols list for users who want to use Find function.
- Must have everything categorized!