OpenWetWare:Publishing/action: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#Implement DOI system for OWW pages (complement existing Citation and Permanent Link features). Need to decide whether or not to use external service or register / implement internal service. | #Implement DOI system for OWW pages (complement existing Citation and Permanent Link features). Need to decide whether or not to use external service or register / implement internal service. | ||
#*'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 16:53, 26 July 2006 (EDT):''''Need to address concerns that making everything "legitimately citable" will reduce the likelihood of contributions to the site. (e.g. I might be less likely to put up my lab notebook with preliminary results if I thought it could be cited with a DOI in a peer-reviewed publication). Don't know how widespread this concern would be, but Sri brought it up and I think it's a pretty good point. You could imagine addressing it by flagging pages as being citable, for instance, but the average page on OWW would not be. | #*'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 16:53, 26 July 2006 (EDT):''''Need to address concerns that making everything "legitimately citable" will reduce the likelihood of contributions to the site. (e.g. I might be less likely to put up my lab notebook with preliminary results if I thought it could be cited with a DOI in a peer-reviewed publication). Don't know how widespread this concern would be, but Sri brought it up and I think it's a pretty good point. You could imagine addressing it by flagging pages as being citable, for instance, but the average page on OWW would not be. | ||
#**'''[[User:Kathmc|Kathleen]] 17:02, 26 July 2006 (EDT)''': I agree with this point. Is there any way to make a section of OWW citable, like pages that constitute the "OWW journal" or similar such that users officially "submit" publications to these pages? That way, it will be a purposeful act that lands someone's information in the citable pages and less likely for someone to accidentally or unknowingly generate citable material. | |||
#Develop prospectus for publishers re: next-gen-web publishing innovation foundry. | #Develop prospectus for publishers re: next-gen-web publishing innovation foundry. | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 26 July 2006
- Implement DOI system for OWW pages (complement existing Citation and Permanent Link features). Need to decide whether or not to use external service or register / implement internal service.
- Jasonk 16:53, 26 July 2006 (EDT):'Need to address concerns that making everything "legitimately citable" will reduce the likelihood of contributions to the site. (e.g. I might be less likely to put up my lab notebook with preliminary results if I thought it could be cited with a DOI in a peer-reviewed publication). Don't know how widespread this concern would be, but Sri brought it up and I think it's a pretty good point. You could imagine addressing it by flagging pages as being citable, for instance, but the average page on OWW would not be.
- Kathleen 17:02, 26 July 2006 (EDT): I agree with this point. Is there any way to make a section of OWW citable, like pages that constitute the "OWW journal" or similar such that users officially "submit" publications to these pages? That way, it will be a purposeful act that lands someone's information in the citable pages and less likely for someone to accidentally or unknowingly generate citable material.
- Jasonk 16:53, 26 July 2006 (EDT):'Need to address concerns that making everything "legitimately citable" will reduce the likelihood of contributions to the site. (e.g. I might be less likely to put up my lab notebook with preliminary results if I thought it could be cited with a DOI in a peer-reviewed publication). Don't know how widespread this concern would be, but Sri brought it up and I think it's a pretty good point. You could imagine addressing it by flagging pages as being citable, for instance, but the average page on OWW would not be.
- Develop prospectus for publishers re: next-gen-web publishing innovation foundry.
