OpenWetWare:Respond to NSF: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#Journal | #Journal | ||
#Organization | #Organization | ||
#Other? | |||
==How should OWW best leverage existing software development efforts?== | |||
#MediaWiki | |||
#Jot/Google | |||
#Apple OS Next | |||
#Other | |||
==What should be the relationship between OWW and publishers?== | |||
#None | |||
#Sell-out | |||
#Destroy |
Revision as of 14:34, 16 January 2007
High Level Comments from NSF
- Wants to see a 3-year plan (willing to hear case for 5 years, w/ evaluation point at EOY3)
- Wants to see money spent on actual stuff (e.g., code) not project management
What user types should OWW target for focused development support? What are the needs of these communities?
- Individual researcher
- Research lab
- Research community
- Educator
- Journal
- Organization
- Other?
How should OWW best leverage existing software development efforts?
- MediaWiki
- Jot/Google
- Apple OS Next
- Other
What should be the relationship between OWW and publishers?
- None
- Sell-out
- Destroy