OpenWetWare:Steering committee/NSF BDI Grant/Outline: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Summary Page=
=Project Summary=
=Research Plan=
=Project Description=
==Laboratory Information Management==
==Motivation==
*Individual laboratories and collaborative groups generate many types of information. 
==Research Plan==
**Laboratory protocols -- recipes, expected results, tips and tricks
 
**equipment -- operation, calibration, expected results
===Information===
**Current research plans/researchers --
====Overview====
**research results
 
**Stocks -- locations/quantities of chemicals, biologicals
====Significance====
**Information aggregation --  strains, collections of useful tools
 
*Ways to access information
====Preliminary results====
**protocols
 
***current access; methods section of published research, aggregated protocol collecions (CPMB), disparate collections of protocols from lab web pages, unpublished  lab protocols & personal communication
====Proposal====
**equipment
 
***company documentation, personal communication
===Community===
**current information on what's happening in lab
====Overview====
***individual laboratory websites (often out of date), publications, personal communication, conferences (posters & talks)
 
**research results
====Significance====
***peer-reviewed publication
 
**stocks
====Preliminary results====
***internal laboratory documents
 
*Some communities have been able to harness information for tight knit communities. For example C. elegans.  This works when community is very centralized; everybody knows each otherNot many communities have the centralization, resources, tech savvy to be able to pull something like that offIn addition, Information must be very structuredStill miss out on other many other sets of dataNot very extendable on the fly.
====Proposal====
 
===Education===
====Overview====
 
====Significance====
 
====Preliminary results====
 
====Proposal====
 
==Assessment==
How do we evaluate success? Analysis and assessment.
 
==Project management==
Who runs what? OversightHiringStabilitization of backendLong term support.
 
=Budget=
 
=Facilities, equipment and other resources=

Latest revision as of 07:43, 23 June 2006

Project Summary

Project Description

Motivation

Research Plan

Information

Overview

Significance

Preliminary results

Proposal

Community

Overview

Significance

Preliminary results

Proposal

Education

Overview

Significance

Preliminary results

Proposal

Assessment

How do we evaluate success? Analysis and assessment.

Project management

Who runs what? Oversight. Hiring. Stabilitization of backend. Long term support.

Budget

Facilities, equipment and other resources