OpenWetWare:Steering committee next meeting: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(139 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
|-
|-
|width="705px" class="green1"|
|width="705px" class="green1"|
''Please post any topics you would like the SC to consider at the next meeting -- you don't need to be on the committee to post something here!''
''To better reflect the community focus of OpenWetWare, we're relaunching our monthly steering meeting as the OWW Community Town Hall.* Unless otherwise indicated, we intend to hold it on the second Thursday of the month at noon. Please post any topics you would like to be covered at the next Community Town Hall meeting -- you don't need to be present at the meeting to post something here!''


'''Next Meeting: April 4th 2007 @ Noon EST ONLINE!'''
'''Next Meeting: Thursday, June 12, at 12 noon U.S. EDT'''


''If you want to call in, please call 617-324-7520(Also, you can participate in the meeting online by [http://openwetware.org/wiki/Special:Chat/OpenWetWare:Steering_committee/Meeting_-_April_2007 joining the chat here])''
''The monthly meeting is both a teleconference (call 617-452-5208) and a chat. Due to our past issues with OWW chat we're looking into using an external chat service for this month's meeing. More info to follow...  ''


*[[OpenWetWare:Reviews]] (jason)
''Everyone is welcome to participate simply by calling in and joining the chat. It tends to work best if participants do both to fully take part in the meeting.''
*pligg (john)
 
*[[OpenWetWare:Software/Feature requests]] (jason)
New items for discussion:
*'''[[User:Lucks|Lucks]] 19:35, 1 April 2007 (EDT)''': Has anyone published a PLoS paper?  On the publishing front, I think it would be very interesting to 'wikify' a PLoS paper.  A link could be given to the main PLoS paper for a standard, citeable piece of work.  The wikified version of the paper could contain additional links to more detailed investigations, etc.
 
*Should the [[Help]] page feature more prominently on the front page?  Or the getting started tutorial sufficient? (Reshma)
* Forums and other means of communication on OWW.
*OpenLabWare appears to be down. Should we try get those materials somehow to put them on OWW so that all that work wasn't in vain (but they have a more restrictive license than we do ... they restrict commercial use of the work)? Anyone know the folks involved?
* Interesting projects that new users can work on. Ideas?
**They [http://www.mitadmissions.org/topics/pulse/mit_inventions_breakthroughs/mit_openlabware_an_interdiscip.shtml just got a grant through MIT], I think the site's just under construction [http://olw.mit.edu/ see here]
* OWW blogs -- what do we want them to accomplish? (e.g. do we need them given Nature Network and Blogger?)
*In what ways could ''scientific'' contributions (e.g. protocols, SOPs, etc) be specifically encouraged to be shared through OWW? Are there ways of creating strong incentives for scientist to contribute in this aspect, in addition to providing the benefits of a collaborative platform through the OWW wiki?--[[User:Ranta|Ranta]] 10:23, 3 April 2007 (EDT) 
 
 
Older or ongoing items:
*"idea of bottom-up development, where new features of OWW are suggested by and in part built by members of the community" - OpenWetWare Platform/API (a la [http://developers.facebook.com/ Facebook])?
* How should we work with/integrate social networking sites such as Epernicus, SciLink, and others?
**[http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/12/google-confirms-friend-connect/ Google Friend Connect] (via [[User:Ricardo_Vidal|Ricardo]])
* license choices? Eg. CC-BY, CC-BY-SA.  [http://www.ocwconsortium.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24&Itemid=58 Open Course Ware consortium] and [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing Wikimedia commons] have incompatible licensing. 
This was brought a few months ago. Is OWW's licensing still appropriate for the way people are (or will be) posting content to the site?  
 
[[OpenWetWare:Community/Project brainstorming]]
[[OpenWetWare:Steering committee next meeting archive|Browse archive]]
[[OpenWetWare:Steering committee next meeting archive|Browse archive]]
|-
|-
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 06:27, 12 June 2008

The OpenWetWare Steering Committee is charged with leading the future direction of OpenWetWare. The steering committee is open to all OWW members, and we are actively seeking participants. You can add yourself to the discuss mailing list.

Members
Who's Involved?
Action List
Action items this month
Next Meeting
Suggested topics
Meetings
Agendas & Notes

To better reflect the community focus of OpenWetWare, we're relaunching our monthly steering meeting as the OWW Community Town Hall.* Unless otherwise indicated, we intend to hold it on the second Thursday of the month at noon. Please post any topics you would like to be covered at the next Community Town Hall meeting -- you don't need to be present at the meeting to post something here!

Next Meeting: Thursday, June 12, at 12 noon U.S. EDT

The monthly meeting is both a teleconference (call 617-452-5208) and a chat. Due to our past issues with OWW chat we're looking into using an external chat service for this month's meeing. More info to follow...

Everyone is welcome to participate simply by calling in and joining the chat. It tends to work best if participants do both to fully take part in the meeting.

New items for discussion:

  • Forums and other means of communication on OWW.
  • Interesting projects that new users can work on. Ideas?
  • OWW blogs -- what do we want them to accomplish? (e.g. do we need them given Nature Network and Blogger?)


Older or ongoing items:

  • "idea of bottom-up development, where new features of OWW are suggested by and in part built by members of the community" - OpenWetWare Platform/API (a la Facebook)?
  • How should we work with/integrate social networking sites such as Epernicus, SciLink, and others?
  • license choices? Eg. CC-BY, CC-BY-SA. Open Course Ware consortium and Wikimedia commons have incompatible licensing.

This was brought a few months ago. Is OWW's licensing still appropriate for the way people are (or will be) posting content to the site?

OpenWetWare:Community/Project brainstorming Browse archive