OpenWetWare:Steering committee next meeting: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
*Nature methods submission / consensus protocols ([[User:Jamesh008|James]])
*Nature methods submission / consensus protocols ([[User:Jamesh008|James]])
*OWW Concept paper for seeking finding - e.g. [http://sciencecommons.org/about/ScienceCommons_Concept_Paper.pdf science commons concept paper]
*OWW Concept paper for seeking finding - e.g. [http://sciencecommons.org/about/ScienceCommons_Concept_Paper.pdf science commons concept paper]
*DOI server - might be nice to be able to have people be able to request a DOI for a particular page that they want to reference in a paper, submit to some sort of PLoS One type repository, etc.  We wouldn't need to have a DOI for every edit, but give users the option...  this falls in the general category of making OWW more citable, and thus provide more avenues for garnering merit for contributing. (Jason)
[[OpenWetWare:Steering committee next meeting archive|Browse Archive]]
[[OpenWetWare:Steering committee next meeting archive|Browse Archive]]
|-
|-

Revision as of 07:27, 9 November 2006

The OpenWetWare Steering Committee is charged with leading the future direction of OpenWetWare. The steering committee is open to all OWW members, and we are actively seeking participants. You can add yourself to the discuss mailing list.

Members
Who's Involved?
Action List
Action items this month
Next Meeting
Suggested topics
Meetings
Agendas & Notes

Please post any topics you would like the SC to consider at the next meeting -- you don't need to be on the committee to post something here!

  • Multiple licensing options when uploading content. (Reshma? noticed you mentioned this.)
  • Nature methods submission / consensus protocols (James)
  • OWW Concept paper for seeking finding - e.g. science commons concept paper
  • DOI server - might be nice to be able to have people be able to request a DOI for a particular page that they want to reference in a paper, submit to some sort of PLoS One type repository, etc. We wouldn't need to have a DOI for every edit, but give users the option... this falls in the general category of making OWW more citable, and thus provide more avenues for garnering merit for contributing. (Jason)

Browse Archive