|
Please post any topics you would like the SC to consider at the next meeting -- you don't need to be on the committee to post something here!
- Multiple licensing options when uploading content. (Reshma? noticed you mentioned this.)
- Nature methods submission / consensus protocols (James)
- Should we write a longer article about the entirety of OWW as well?
- Would be good for advertising, but also to provide substrate to our supporters out there - from maureen: "I'm not available for the meeting today but am following the discussion and will look at the meeting notes. Nice idea about the article. I'm trying hard to get the FA community on the wiki. Many are interested but just don't seem to understand it or how it could benefit them. This article will help."
- OWW Concept paper for seeking finding - e.g. science commons concept paper
- DOI server - might be nice to be able to have people be able to request a DOI for a particular page that they want to reference in a paper, submit to some sort of PLoS One type repository, etc. We wouldn't need to have a DOI for every edit, but give users the option... this falls in the general category of making OWW more citable, and thus provide more avenues for garnering merit for contributing. (Jason)
Browse Archive
|
