OpenWetWare talk:Blogs

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {discussion} =Should we have a 'real' blog available for each OWW user, using wordpress for instance?= *'''~~~~:''' ''Austin and I have been discussing this via email, I'm moving it here ...)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{discussion}
+
{{discussion}}
=Should we have a 'real' blog available for each OWW user, using wordpress for instance?=
=Should we have a 'real' blog available for each OWW user, using wordpress for instance?=
Line 8: Line 8:
***run wordpress or similar and do some kind of integration with oww. You get whatever bells and whistles of 'real' blogging software but it becomes a bit disconnected from the wiki  
***run wordpress or similar and do some kind of integration with oww. You get whatever bells and whistles of 'real' blogging software but it becomes a bit disconnected from the wiki  
***blog on the wiki itself. good integration. The only question is what features of a blog you really want and whether it's easy to implement on the wiki. The basics like showing the most recent posts is easy (e.g [[Blogs]]) but Mac says it's not a blog because "it doesn't look like a blog." I don't know what that really means but even if we dewikified it and put some skin on to it e.g. [http://blogs.openwetware.org/] it may still not be a 'real' blog. RSS feeds should be doable using the filtered recent changes. User comments are easily doable if we want to install an extension. Other features I don't know about.
***blog on the wiki itself. good integration. The only question is what features of a blog you really want and whether it's easy to implement on the wiki. The basics like showing the most recent posts is easy (e.g [[Blogs]]) but Mac says it's not a blog because "it doesn't look like a blog." I don't know what that really means but even if we dewikified it and put some skin on to it e.g. [http://blogs.openwetware.org/] it may still not be a 'real' blog. RSS feeds should be doable using the filtered recent changes. User comments are easily doable if we want to install an extension. Other features I don't know about.
 +
*'''[[User:Jason R. Kelly|Jason R. Kelly]]''':Yeah, I think you need to be an actual "blog", e.g. calendar on the side, place for comments, etc.  Plus people will want to use stuff like feed burner to keep track of who subscribes, how many hits they get, etc.  All the exciting stuff about self-publishing!  If you don't have that, you lose some of the incentive. So i like this option:
 +
**run wordpress or similar and do some kind of integration with oww. You get whatever bells and whistles of 'real' blogging software but it becomes a bit disconnected from the wiki
 +
*Open question is would users actually use this rather than blogger?
 +
**http://scienceblogs.com/ is an example -- the bloggers can only customize the header graphic,
 +
o/w all the blogs look the same.  Don't know if something like this would be popular w OWW users, but we could find out.

Revision as of 09:48, 7 June 2007

Should we have a 'real' blog available for each OWW user, using wordpress for instance?

  • Jason R. Kelly 09:45, 7 June 2007 (EDT): Austin and I have been discussing this via email, I'm moving it here to get more input.
  • Jason R. Kelly::how hard do you think it would it be to give users blogs through OWW? you think it will be a disaster? Or should I just sign up for blogger?
    • Austin:It depends on what kind of a blog you are envisioning. These are the possible solutions I can think of:
      • each user signs up for a different blogging service. no integration at all.
      • run wordpress or similar and do some kind of integration with oww. You get whatever bells and whistles of 'real' blogging software but it becomes a bit disconnected from the wiki
      • blog on the wiki itself. good integration. The only question is what features of a blog you really want and whether it's easy to implement on the wiki. The basics like showing the most recent posts is easy (e.g Blogs) but Mac says it's not a blog because "it doesn't look like a blog." I don't know what that really means but even if we dewikified it and put some skin on to it e.g. [1] it may still not be a 'real' blog. RSS feeds should be doable using the filtered recent changes. User comments are easily doable if we want to install an extension. Other features I don't know about.
  • Jason R. Kelly:Yeah, I think you need to be an actual "blog", e.g. calendar on the side, place for comments, etc. Plus people will want to use stuff like feed burner to keep track of who subscribes, how many hits they get, etc. All the exciting stuff about self-publishing! If you don't have that, you lose some of the incentive. So i like this option:
    • run wordpress or similar and do some kind of integration with oww. You get whatever bells and whistles of 'real' blogging software but it becomes a bit disconnected from the wiki
  • Open question is would users actually use this rather than blogger?

o/w all the blogs look the same. Don't know if something like this would be popular w OWW users, but we could find out.

Personal tools