OpenWetWare talk:Scientific Pipeline: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: *'''~~~~''': The svg conversion to png on the wiki is not a complete conversion. Specifically it ignores markers which are used to denote line end arrows so this doesn't quite look correct...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
*'''[[User:Austin J. Che|Austin Che]] 12:36, 9 September 2007 (EDT)''': The svg conversion to png on the wiki is not a complete conversion. Specifically it ignores markers which are used to denote line end arrows so this doesn't quite look correct. The thing in the upper left corner should be on the end of all the lines on the top. But this file should be understood correctly by any svg program. So if anyone wants to edit this, any reasonable svg program should be able to handle this (I used inkscape).
*'''[[User:Austin J. Che|Austin Che]] 12:36, 9 September 2007 (EDT)''': The svg conversion to png on the wiki is not a complete conversion. Specifically it ignores markers which are used to denote line end arrows so this doesn't quite look correct. The thing in the upper left corner should be on the end of all the lines on the top. But this file should be understood correctly by any svg program. So if anyone wants to edit this, any reasonable svg program should be able to handle this (I used inkscape).
**'''[[User:Reshma P. Shetty|Reshma]] 16:18, 9 September 2007 (EDT)''': I like the concept and information behind this figure, but it needs to be prettier :)

Revision as of 13:18, 9 September 2007

  • Austin Che 12:36, 9 September 2007 (EDT): The svg conversion to png on the wiki is not a complete conversion. Specifically it ignores markers which are used to denote line end arrows so this doesn't quite look correct. The thing in the upper left corner should be on the end of all the lines on the top. But this file should be understood correctly by any svg program. So if anyone wants to edit this, any reasonable svg program should be able to handle this (I used inkscape).
    • Reshma 16:18, 9 September 2007 (EDT): I like the concept and information behind this figure, but it needs to be prettier :)