OpenWetWare talk:Steering committee: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:OpenWetWare steering committee moved to OpenWetWare talk:Steering committee)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==New Layout==
'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 10:41, 3 September 2006 (EDT):''' The SC page needs a cleanup since most of the information is outdated, and in general its a little daunting for someone seeing it for the first time.  I also think the categories 'info management', 'software dev', etc, might also need updating/replacing.
*Things that should be on the SC page:
**when the next meeting is going to be
**what are current discussions/activities going on (e.g. action list from previous meeting)
**List of members, how to join
**links to subgroup homepages (any subgroups we actually want to keep and have someone willing to run).
**other suggestions?
==Archived==
*Added links to pages for discussion/suggestions for each section. Hopefully, this will promote community participation in the discussion.--[[User:Kathmc|Kathleen]] 22:12, 5 February 2006 (EST)
*Added links to pages for discussion/suggestions for each section. Hopefully, this will promote community participation in the discussion.--[[User:Kathmc|Kathleen]] 22:12, 5 February 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 05:05, 7 September 2006

New Layout

Jasonk 10:41, 3 September 2006 (EDT): The SC page needs a cleanup since most of the information is outdated, and in general its a little daunting for someone seeing it for the first time. I also think the categories 'info management', 'software dev', etc, might also need updating/replacing.

  • Things that should be on the SC page:
    • when the next meeting is going to be
    • what are current discussions/activities going on (e.g. action list from previous meeting)
    • List of members, how to join
    • links to subgroup homepages (any subgroups we actually want to keep and have someone willing to run).
    • other suggestions?


Archived

  • Added links to pages for discussion/suggestions for each section. Hopefully, this will promote community participation in the discussion.--Kathleen 22:12, 5 February 2006 (EST)