Open peer review: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(open review journals) |
(open review journals) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Open review journals == | == Open review journals == | ||
* BMJ | * BMJ - provides reviewer names since 1999 [http://www.bmj.com/content/318/7175/4] | ||
* BioMed Central medical journals provide named reviews since 2000 [http://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/authorfaq/medical] | * BioMed Central medical journals provide named reviews since 2000 [http://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/authorfaq/medical] | ||
* Biology Direct, launched in 2006, has a fully open peer review process [http://www.biologydirect.com/content/1/1/1] | * Biology Direct, launched in 2006, has a fully open peer review process [http://www.biologydirect.com/content/1/1/1] | ||
* Frontiers review journals, improved their review process in 2007 [http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2013_04_09/caredit.a1300068] disclosing reviewer names, adding their comments to the review, and introducing a moderated post-publication community review [http://www.frontiersin.org/about/reviewsystem] | * Frontiers review journals, improved their review process in 2007 [http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2013_04_09/caredit.a1300068] disclosing reviewer names, adding their comments to the review, and introducing a moderated post-publication community review [http://www.frontiersin.org/about/reviewsystem] | ||
* EMBO J started publishing review material in 2009 for authors who opt in [http://emboj.embopress.org/about#Review_Process] | |||
* BMJ Open adds reviews to the previously published author names in 2011 [http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml#peer] | |||
* eLife, created in 2012, publishes the decision letter and responses if authors opt [http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml#peer] | |||
* F1000Research, created in 2012, is the 1st journal to use open post-publication review [http://f1000research.com/about] | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 5 November 2014
In open peer review valuable feedback and discussion generated during the peer review process of a scientific article is disclosed to the public rather than trashed, as is still unfortunately the norm.
Open review journals
- BMJ - provides reviewer names since 1999 [1]
- BioMed Central medical journals provide named reviews since 2000 [2]
- Biology Direct, launched in 2006, has a fully open peer review process [3]
- Frontiers review journals, improved their review process in 2007 [4] disclosing reviewer names, adding their comments to the review, and introducing a moderated post-publication community review [5]
- EMBO J started publishing review material in 2009 for authors who opt in [6]
- BMJ Open adds reviews to the previously published author names in 2011 [7]
- eLife, created in 2012, publishes the decision letter and responses if authors opt [8]
- F1000Research, created in 2012, is the 1st journal to use open post-publication review [9]
See also
- Open peer review in the Wikipedia
- Open peer review on F1000 blog
- A case for open peer review for clinical trials by Harriman 2014
