Open peer review: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(open review journals)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Treasure-chest-242317 640.jpg|right|200px]]
[[Image:Treasure-chest-242317 640.jpg|right|200px]]


In '''open peer review''' valuable feedback and discussion generated during the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review peer review] process of a scientific article is disclosed to the public rather than trashed, as is still unfortunately the norm.
In '''open peer review''' valuable feedback and discussions generated during the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review peer review] process of a scientific article are disclosed to the public rather than trashed, as is still unfortunately the norm. This opens up a treasure trove of information, opinions, criticism, and rebuttals to interested scientists and the general public.


== Open review journals ==
== Open review journals ==

Revision as of 09:46, 5 November 2014

In open peer review valuable feedback and discussions generated during the peer review process of a scientific article are disclosed to the public rather than trashed, as is still unfortunately the norm. This opens up a treasure trove of information, opinions, criticism, and rebuttals to interested scientists and the general public.

Open review journals

  • BMJ - provides reviewer names since 1999 [1]
  • BioMed Central medical journals provide named reviews since 2000 [2]
  • Biology Direct, launched in 2006, has a fully open peer review process [3]
  • Frontiers review journals, improved their review process in 2007 [4] disclosing reviewer names, adding their comments to the review, and introducing a moderated post-publication community review [5]
  • EMBO J started publishing review material in 2009 for authors who opt in [6]
  • BMJ Open adds reviews to the previously published author names in 2011 [7]
  • eLife, created in 2012, publishes the decision letter and responses if authors opt [8]
  • F1000Research, created in 2012, is the 1st journal to use open post-publication review [9]

See also

Related OWW pages