Parts characterization: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#What are the current available methods for characterization of parts? | #What are the current available methods for characterization of parts? | ||
#Which characterization methods are particularly relevant to certain parts? | #Which characterization methods are particularly relevant to certain parts? | ||
#How can we ensure that these methods can be applied in a standardized way across labs? | #How can we ensure that these methods can easily be applied in a standardized way across labs? i.e. how do we make the information produced by an experiment be independent of the particular experiment? | ||
#What information does each characterization method provide about a part? | #What information does each characterization method provide about a part? | ||
#Are standard operating conditions important? | #Are standard operating conditions important? | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Meetings== | ==Meetings== | ||
=== | ===Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 at 1pm in 68-474=== | ||
====Attending==== | |||
*[[Austin Che | Austin]] | |||
*[[User:Bcanton|BC]] | |||
*[[Reshma Shetty | RS]] | *[[Reshma Shetty | RS]] | ||
*[[Caitlin Conboy|cmc]] | |||
*[[Samantha Sutton|Samarita]] | |||
*[[Jason Kelly|JK]] | *[[Jason Kelly|JK]] | ||
*[[User: | *[[Natalie Kuldell | Natalie]] | ||
*[[User:Randy|Randy]] | |||
*[[Meagan Lizarazo|Meagan]] | |||
*[[Tom Knight | Tom]] | |||
*[[Alex Mallet | Alex]] | |||
====Notes==== | |||
'''Short term to do list''' | |||
#F plasmids - [[Reshma Shetty | Reshma]] | |||
#Antibiotic resistance cassettes - [[Tom Knight | Tom]] | |||
#Terminators - [[Jason Kelly | Jason]] | |||
#FCS - [[Caitlin Conboy|Caitlin]] and [[Reshma Shetty | Reshma]] | |||
#pheS (PCR or synthesize) - [[Tom Knight | Tom]] | |||
== | ==Substrate for discussion== | ||
This is an attempt to organize some of the available characterization methodologies as well as the type of information that they generate. It might help us formulate the beginnings of a characterization standard(s). Feel free to edit and revise since this is very preliminary and likely has errors and is missing useful techniques. | |||
*[[Parts characterization/Measurement techniques]] | |||
*[[Parts characterization/Characterization approaches]] | |||
==Notes== | |||
*[[Standard E. coli Strain for BioBricks]] | |||
*[[Synthetic Biology:Vectors | Vectors for Synthetic Biology]] | |||
*[[Bacterial artificial chromosomes]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 3 January 2006
Characterization of standard biological parts is an essential step in enabling construction of more complicated devices and systems based on these parts. A standard method of characterization (or several standards) will better enable sharing of parts between different laboratories, as well as improve our ability to design devices.
Discussion Topics
- What are the current available methods for characterization of parts?
- Which characterization methods are particularly relevant to certain parts?
- How can we ensure that these methods can easily be applied in a standardized way across labs? i.e. how do we make the information produced by an experiment be independent of the particular experiment?
- What information does each characterization method provide about a part?
- Are standard operating conditions important?
- When is the characterization of a part finished? i.e. What would a characterization standard look like?
Meetings
Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 at 1pm in 68-474
Attending
Notes
Short term to do list
- F plasmids - Reshma
- Antibiotic resistance cassettes - Tom
- Terminators - Jason
- FCS - Caitlin and Reshma
- pheS (PCR or synthesize) - Tom
Substrate for discussion
This is an attempt to organize some of the available characterization methodologies as well as the type of information that they generate. It might help us formulate the beginnings of a characterization standard(s). Feel free to edit and revise since this is very preliminary and likely has errors and is missing useful techniques.
