Patent goon squad: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Talk:Patent goon squad|Discuss here]] | [[Talk:Patent goon squad|Discuss here]] | ||
=Contentious Patent Applications= | |||
''It might be an idea to post important patents and allow people to add prior art that they might know about.'' | |||
==Genetic circuit inverting amplifier== | |||
*[http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patsearch.cgi?patnum=US+2005/112615+A1#show Genetic Inverter Patent Application] | |||
===Prior Art (pre June 5,2003)=== | |||
[http://www.cs.plu.edu/pub/faculty/spillman/seniorprojarts/dna_digital.pdf Weiss & Knight 1999] - see fig 1, a biological inverter based on gene expression. | |||
==Open Questions== | ==Open Questions== | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 24 May 2007
The general idea would be for scientists (who might be so inclined) to actively keep an eye on new patent applications in their fields of interest in order to push back on overly-broad patents. I think there would be an interest in this sort of thing for synthetic biology at a minimum, but the feasibility is an open question :)
Contentious Patent Applications
It might be an idea to post important patents and allow people to add prior art that they might know about.
Genetic circuit inverting amplifier
Prior Art (pre June 5,2003)
Weiss & Knight 1999 - see fig 1, a biological inverter based on gene expression.
Open Questions
Please add/edit -- or answer!
- How hard is it to filter patents via existing search tools (e.g. into sub-fields)?
- What is the number of 'biology' patent applications submitted each day?
- Can you get access to the applications early enough in the process to effect the outcome?
- Others?
Background
- The US patent office sounds like it might be interested in this sort of community input (Washington Post).
Participants
- Hanna Breetz, Technology and Policy Program at MIT
- Jason Kelly, BE at MIT
