Physics307L:People/Long/Formal Report: Difference between revisions
Ryan P. Long (talk | contribs) |
Ryan P. Long (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The speed of light is a very large value, nevertheless, the speed of light can be measured using relatively simple time of flight methods. Experiments of this sort have been carried out since Isaac Beeckman and Galileo Galilei first tried in the early 1600s. [1] In Junior Lab at University of New Mexico, we measure the speed of light by measuring flight time of LED pulses over the course of a short distance. A major obstacle to overcome in this experiment is the occurence of "time walk", this can cause major systematic error, if not addressed properly. | The speed of light is a very large value, nevertheless, the speed of light can be measured using relatively simple time of flight methods. Experiments of this sort have been carried out since Isaac Beeckman and Galileo Galilei first tried in the early 1600s. [1] In Junior Lab at University of New Mexico, we measure the speed of light by measuring flight time of LED pulses over the course of a short distance. A major obstacle to overcome in this experiment is the occurence of "time walk", this can cause major systematic error, if not addressed properly. We obtain a value of <math>29.448\pm .142<\math>, which is inconsistent with the accepted value, indicating systematic error. |
Revision as of 22:36, 9 December 2009
Author: Ryan Long
Experimentalists: Ryan Long & Tom Mahony
The University of New Mexico
Department of Physics & Astronomy
email: rlong1@unm.edu
Abstract
The speed of light is a very large value, nevertheless, the speed of light can be measured using relatively simple time of flight methods. Experiments of this sort have been carried out since Isaac Beeckman and Galileo Galilei first tried in the early 1600s. [1] In Junior Lab at University of New Mexico, we measure the speed of light by measuring flight time of LED pulses over the course of a short distance. A major obstacle to overcome in this experiment is the occurence of "time walk", this can cause major systematic error, if not addressed properly. We obtain a value of <math>29.448\pm .142<\math>, which is inconsistent with the accepted value, indicating systematic error.