Physics307L:People/Long/Formal Report: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 13: Line 13:


==Abstract==
==Abstract==
The speed of light is a very large value, nevertheless, the speed of light can be measured using relatively simple time of flight methods.  Experiments of this sort have been carried out since Isaac Beeckman and Galileo Galilei first tried in the early 1600s. [1] In Junior Lab at University of New Mexico, we measure the speed of light by measuring flight time of LED pulses over the course of a short distance. A major obstacle to overcome in this experiment is the occurence of "time walk", this can cause major systematic error, if not addressed properly.
The speed of light is a very large value, nevertheless, the speed of light can be measured using relatively simple time of flight methods.  Experiments of this sort have been carried out since Isaac Beeckman and Galileo Galilei first tried in the early 1600s. [1] In Junior Lab at University of New Mexico, we measure the speed of light by measuring flight time of LED pulses over the course of a short distance. A major obstacle to overcome in this experiment is the occurence of "time walk", this can cause major systematic error, if not addressed properly.  We obtain a value of <math>29.448\pm .142<\math>, which is inconsistent with the accepted value, indicating systematic error.

Revision as of 22:36, 9 December 2009

Author: Ryan Long

Experimentalists: Ryan Long & Tom Mahony

The University of New Mexico

Department of Physics & Astronomy

email: rlong1@unm.edu


Abstract

The speed of light is a very large value, nevertheless, the speed of light can be measured using relatively simple time of flight methods. Experiments of this sort have been carried out since Isaac Beeckman and Galileo Galilei first tried in the early 1600s. [1] In Junior Lab at University of New Mexico, we measure the speed of light by measuring flight time of LED pulses over the course of a short distance. A major obstacle to overcome in this experiment is the occurence of "time walk", this can cause major systematic error, if not addressed properly. We obtain a value of <math>29.448\pm .142<\math>, which is inconsistent with the accepted value, indicating systematic error.