Prather:Gibson CBA

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
Current revision (20:28, 8 August 2010) (view source)
(References)
 
(7 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 25: Line 25:
:0.64 μL 10 U/μL  T5 exonuclease
:0.64 μL 10 U/μL  T5 exonuclease
:20 μL  2 U/μL  Phusion DNA Pol
:20 μL  2 U/μL  Phusion DNA Pol
-
:0.16 μL 40 000 U/ul Taq DNA Ligase
+
:0.16 μL 40 000 U/μL Taq DNA Ligase
:<ins>860 μL ddH2O</ins>
:<ins>860 μL ddH2O</ins>
:1.2 ml Total
:1.2 ml Total
Line 43: Line 43:
# When preparing the isothermal reaction mix, add the PEG slowly to liquid.  If added too quickly it will form a plug which will make mixing difficult (KS)
# When preparing the isothermal reaction mix, add the PEG slowly to liquid.  If added too quickly it will form a plug which will make mixing difficult (KS)
-
# The initial paper suggests that 10 - 100 ng of total DNA be used for assemblies.  I've gone as high as 170 ng without any ill effects.
+
# The initial paper suggests that 10 - 100 ng of total DNA be used for assemblies.  I've gone as high as 170 ng without any ill effects. (KS)
# Have successfully used for a two way and three way ligation (KS)
# Have successfully used for a two way and three way ligation (KS)
# There is a potential for mutations at the DNA boundaries which has yet to be quantified.  Paper suggests 1 every 50 assemblies or so.  Of the two initial assemblies I made, one had a missense mutation so sequence to verify interfaces or leave spacers (~ 50 bp or so) at the interfaces to 'absorb' these errors (KS)
# There is a potential for mutations at the DNA boundaries which has yet to be quantified.  Paper suggests 1 every 50 assemblies or so.  Of the two initial assemblies I made, one had a missense mutation so sequence to verify interfaces or leave spacers (~ 50 bp or so) at the interfaces to 'absorb' these errors (KS)
# I have used PCRs as is (with PCR cleanup only) and gel extracted DNA in my assemblies.  PCR cleanup gives more colonies (more DNA, better quality (no agarose/QG contamination)) but also has more false positives (PCR template plasmid).  False positives may be alleviated by DpnI treatment if gel extraction is not used but I haven't tested this yet (KS).
# I have used PCRs as is (with PCR cleanup only) and gel extracted DNA in my assemblies.  PCR cleanup gives more colonies (more DNA, better quality (no agarose/QG contamination)) but also has more false positives (PCR template plasmid).  False positives may be alleviated by DpnI treatment if gel extraction is not used but I haven't tested this yet (KS).
-
#  I once inadvertently designed my primers with 20 bp homology and a 20 bp spacer from the adjacent fragment and still got accurate plasmids.  Possible to use shorter primers if desired (KS)
+
#  I once inadvertently designed my primers with 20 bp homology and a 20 bp spacer from the adjacent fragment and still got accurate plasmids.  Possible to use less overlap if desired (KS)
<br />
<br />
Line 54: Line 54:
<biblio>
<biblio>
#Gibson-nmeth-2009 pmid=19363495
#Gibson-nmeth-2009 pmid=19363495
 +
//Isothermal assembly method
 +
#Gibson-science-2008 pmid=18218864
 +
//Two step thermocycled assembly variant
</biblio>
</biblio>
<br />
<br />
----
----
[[Prather:Protocols|Back to Prather Lab Protocols]]
[[Prather:Protocols|Back to Prather Lab Protocols]]

Current revision

Contents

Gibson Chew Back And Anneal Assembly: One Step Isothermal

Gibson Chew Back and Anneal Assembly (Gibson CBA) is a quick and easy method to construct plasmids without using restriction enzymes. In this method, DNA fragments to be assembled are PCR amplified with 40 bp of overlap to the adjacent sequence (only one DNA fragment per interface needs to have an overlap extension into the adjacent fragment). These fragments are then mixed in a single pot with a single strand exonuclease to generate sticky ends and allowed to anneal before being repaired by a polymerase and a ligase. In theory, many fragments can be assembled simultaneously (5, 4 inserts + backbone, have been documented in the initial report) into a single product of up to ~100 kb+. The method has several thermocycled variants of higher efficiency but the isothermal protocol offers almost comparable yields with greater simplicity.

Method

Reagents

5x Isothermal Reaction Mix

3 ml 1 M Tris-Hcl (pH 7.5)
300 μL 1 M MgCl2
60 μL 100 mM dGTP
60 μL 100 mM dATP
60 μL 100 mM dTTP
60 μL 100 mM dCTP
300 μL 1 M DTT
1.5 g PEG-8000
300 μL 100 mM NAD
balance ddH2O
6 ml Total


Assembly Master Mix

320 μL 5X Isothermal Master Mix
0.64 μL 10 U/μL T5 exonuclease
20 μL 2 U/μL Phusion DNA Pol
0.16 μL 40 000 U/μL Taq DNA Ligase
860 μL ddH2O
1.2 ml Total


Aliquoted reaction and master mixes are stable at -20°C and can withstand several freeze thaw cycles.

Protocol

  1. PCR vector and insert(s) ensuring that at least 40 bp homology exists between adjacent fragments
  2. Thaw assembly master mix and keep on ice until ready to be used
  3. Mix 15 ul of assembly mixture with 5 ul total of cleaned PCR product (PCR Cleanup Kit or Gel Extraction) keeping DNA inserts in equimolar amounts
  4. Incubate at 50 °C for 15-60 min (60 min optimal).
  5. Transform cells with no more than 1 ul of assembly mixture.


Comments

  1. When preparing the isothermal reaction mix, add the PEG slowly to liquid. If added too quickly it will form a plug which will make mixing difficult (KS)
  2. The initial paper suggests that 10 - 100 ng of total DNA be used for assemblies. I've gone as high as 170 ng without any ill effects. (KS)
  3. Have successfully used for a two way and three way ligation (KS)
  4. There is a potential for mutations at the DNA boundaries which has yet to be quantified. Paper suggests 1 every 50 assemblies or so. Of the two initial assemblies I made, one had a missense mutation so sequence to verify interfaces or leave spacers (~ 50 bp or so) at the interfaces to 'absorb' these errors (KS)
  5. I have used PCRs as is (with PCR cleanup only) and gel extracted DNA in my assemblies. PCR cleanup gives more colonies (more DNA, better quality (no agarose/QG contamination)) but also has more false positives (PCR template plasmid). False positives may be alleviated by DpnI treatment if gel extraction is not used but I haven't tested this yet (KS).
  6. I once inadvertently designed my primers with 20 bp homology and a 20 bp spacer from the adjacent fragment and still got accurate plasmids. Possible to use less overlap if desired (KS)


References

  1. Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA 3rd, and Smith HO. . pmid:19363495. PubMed HubMed [Gibson-nmeth-2009]
    Isothermal assembly method

  2. Gibson DG, Benders GA, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Denisova EA, Baden-Tillson H, Zaveri J, Stockwell TB, Brownley A, Thomas DW, Algire MA, Merryman C, Young L, Noskov VN, Glass JI, Venter JC, Hutchison CA 3rd, and Smith HO. . pmid:18218864. PubMed HubMed [Gibson-science-2008]
    Two step thermocycled assembly variant

All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed



Back to Prather Lab Protocols

Personal tools