Publishing Group: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Suggested an alternate date...) |
Barry Canton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Alternate Date:''' | '''Alternate Date:''' | ||
*October 5th from noon to 1:30pm? | *October 5th from noon to 1:30pm? | ||
:I can make this -[[User:Bcanton|BC]] | |||
Revision as of 10:30, 26 September 2005
There's been some rolling discussion of how research publishing should work (i.e., might be improved), especially as it relates to Synthetic Biology.
I'd like to propose a BYO working lunch on Thursday October 6 from noon to 1:30p to discuss current thoughts.
If this date/time don't work, please suggest another date time (before October 10).
Alternate Date:
- October 5th from noon to 1:30pm?
- I can make this -BC
Please add your name to the list if you will attend.
Please add your ideas/questions below that you would like to discuss.
Attending:
- Drew
- BC - can't make it before 1pm
- Reshma
- Natalie
- Austin Che
- Jason - can't make it until >2:30.
- Pam Silver
- Samantha
Things to discuss:
- Do we need a Synthetic Biology specific journal?
- Does the peer review process, as practiced work?
- Is peer review needed for engineering research articles?
- What features would we like for our papers? Reader comments? Reader Wiki?
- How should the structure of a paper be changed to reflect things like, well, the Internets?
- What existing journals are the most appropriate/receptive venues for publication of SB work?
- How is publishing on SB topics different from any other field?
- What are the other (if any) alternate publishing models already out there?
- Non-synthetic biology improvement:Author IDs or URIs or something. Noticed this while trying to set up myNCBI searches for people with more common names, what a pain. I'm changing my name to xyuitk.
- <your question/idea>