|
|
| (51 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ''Moved from [[OpenWetWare:Ideas]] page:''
| | [[Image:Oww Reviews.png]] |
| | ==OpenWetWare Reviews== |
|
| |
|
| *Jasonk 09:26, 6 October 2006 (EDT): Along the lines of adopt-a-protocol, it might be great to have adopt a topic area as well. Basically, trying to solve the problem of review articles always being out of date. It seems like the job of writing reviews would be much simpler if it was done on the fly as new papers came out. THat way when a new paper came accross your desk in the area you review you could read it, and then add the relevant details and the reference to the OWW Review page. This is in contrast to coming back to that same paper a year later when you're asked to write a review and having to re-read it, re-analyze it, etc. Seems like a win-win for the both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date source.)
| | OpenWetWare Reviews is an experiment in providing always up-to-date scientific reviews. When a new publication comes out it can be easily incorporated into the review by OWW editors. This should be a win-win for both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date resource). We'll be trying reviews with a 'curator' (as discussed for [[Consensus protocol|consensus protocols]]) as well as ones without. |
| *'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 09:43, 26 February 2007 (EST):''' I think it might be worth trying this out with the 'curator' approach we discussed for [[Consensus protocol|Consensus protocols]].
| | *[[List:Reviews|Join the mailing list]] to discuss OWW Reviews (reviews at openwetware.org) |
|
| |
|
| ==Next steps== | | ==Current Reviews== |
| #Wikify some existing OA reviews
| | *[[Reviews:Directed evolution/Library construction]] |
| #Try and get the original author (or someone expert in the topic area) to be the curator for a few of the articles.
| | *[[Reviews:Synthetic biology]] |
| #Leave some of the articles curator-free as a trial, still not clear if you want/need a curator.
| | *[[Optimality In Biology]] |
|
| |
|
| ==Wikify existing Reviews== | | ==Want to help out?== |
| | *[[Reviews:FAQ]] |
| | *[[Reviews:Community portal]] |
| | *[[Reviews:About]] |
|
| |
|
| ==Curators wanted==
| | __NOTOC__ |
| *'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 11:37, 6 March 2007 (EST):''' Anyone interested in being a curator for a review in their field of expertise? I can't promise you scientific rewards yet, but I suspect this will become an accepted form of merit down the line ;)
| |
| | |
| ==Resources==
| |
| | |
| * Is there an easy way to search only OA journals?
| |
| ** Looks like best bet would be to search known OA journals such as [http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/ BMC] or [http://Plos.org PLoS].
| |
| **not sure if this is just OA, but just for UK I think: http://ukpmc.ac.uk/ --[[User:Johncumbers|Johncumbers]] 19:46, 6 March 2007 (EST)
| |
| ***Yeah, I don't think PMC is OA, rather it is mainly "free", which is worse -- "All the articles in [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ PMC] are free (sometimes on a delayed basis). Some journals go beyond free, to [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/openaccess.html Open Access]." (from the PMC homepage).
| |
| | |
| ==Online Discussion of Wiki Reviews==
| |
| | |
| * [http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/03/07/wiki_reviews Nodalpoint - Wiki Reviews]
| |
| * [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/2007/03/openwetwarereviews-jason-kelly-opened.html Pedro - Public Rambling]
| |
| * [http://nsaunders.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/wikireviews-an-inspired-idea/ Neil Saunders - WYDIRD]
| |
| * [http://mndoci.com/blog/2007/03/06/openwetwarereviews/ Depak - business|bytes|genes|molecules]
| |
