|
|
| (47 intermediate revisions not shown.) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | [[Image:Oww Reviews.png]] | | [[Image:Oww Reviews.png]] |
| - | ==OpenWetWare:Reviews== | + | ==OpenWetWare Reviews== |
| | | | |
| - | OpenWetWare:Reviews is an experiment in providing always up-to-date scientific reviews. When a new publication comes out it can be easily incorporated into the review by OWW editors. This should be a win-win for both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date resource). We'll be trying reviews with a 'curator' (as discussed for [[Consensus protocol|consensus protocols]]) as well as ones without. | + | OpenWetWare Reviews is an experiment in providing always up-to-date scientific reviews. When a new publication comes out it can be easily incorporated into the review by OWW editors. This should be a win-win for both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date resource). We'll be trying reviews with a 'curator' (as discussed for [[Consensus protocol|consensus protocols]]) as well as ones without. |
| | + | *[[List:Reviews|Join the mailing list]] to discuss OWW Reviews (reviews at openwetware.org) |
| | | | |
| - | ==Next steps== | + | ==Current Reviews== |
| - | #Wikify some existing OA reviews
| + | *[[Reviews:Directed evolution/Library construction]] |
| - | #Try and get the original author (or someone expert in the topic area) to be the curator for a few of the articles.
| + | *[[Reviews:Synthetic biology]] |
| - | #Leave some of the articles curator-free as a trial, still not clear if you want/need a curator.
| + | *[[Optimality In Biology]] |
| | | | |
| - | ==Wikify existing Reviews== | + | ==Want to help out?== |
| - | *At the moment it looks like we should find good reviews in PLoS and BMC, as they are the only journals that allow derivative works. If there is a review in a journal where the author retains copyright, then we can ask the author to release a pre-print version under a CC license and that should work too. (see the [[OpenWetWare talk:Reviews|talk page]]) | + | *[[Reviews:FAQ]] |
| - | | + | *[[Reviews:Community portal]] |
| - | ==Curators wanted==
| + | *[[Reviews:About]] |
| - | *'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 11:37, 6 March 2007 (EST):''' Anyone interested in being a curator for a review in their field of expertise? I can't promise you scientific rewards yet, but I suspect this will become an accepted form of merit down the line ;)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==Resources==
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | * Is there an easy way to search only OA journals? | + | |
| - | ** Looks like best bet would be to search known OA journals such as [http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/ BMC] or [http://Plos.org PLoS].
| + | |
| - | **not sure if this is just OA, but just for UK I think: http://ukpmc.ac.uk/ --[[User:Johncumbers|Johncumbers]] 19:46, 6 March 2007 (EST)
| + | |
| - | ***Yeah, I don't think PMC is OA, rather it is mainly "free", which is worse -- "All the articles in [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ PMC] are free (sometimes on a delayed basis). Some journals go beyond free, to [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/openaccess.html Open Access]." (from the PMC homepage). | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==Online Discussion of Wiki Reviews==
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | * [http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/03/07/wiki_reviews Nodalpoint - Wiki Reviews]
| + | |
| - | * [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/2007/03/openwetwarereviews-jason-kelly-opened.html Pedro - Public Rambling]
| + | |
| - | * [http://nsaunders.wordpress.com/2007/03/08/wikireviews-an-inspired-idea/ Neil Saunders - WYDIRD]
| + | |
| - | * [http://mndoci.com/blog/2007/03/06/openwetwarereviews/ Depak - business|bytes|genes|molecules]
| + | |
| | | | |
| | __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
OpenWetWare Reviews is an experiment in providing always up-to-date scientific reviews. When a new publication comes out it can be easily incorporated into the review by OWW editors. This should be a win-win for both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date resource). We'll be trying reviews with a 'curator' (as discussed for consensus protocols) as well as ones without.
