SBB11Ntbk-ChrisAnderson: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
==~~!~~==
==~~!~~==
==[[User:JCAnderson|JCAnderson]] 13:03, 3 February 2011 (EST)==
This is my next entry.
==[[User:JCAnderson|JCAnderson]] 22:54, 31 January 2011 (EST)==
==[[User:JCAnderson|JCAnderson]] 22:54, 31 January 2011 (EST)==
Sequencing data for the first two clones of both sbb17 and sbb18 came in last week.  I analyzed the data and found 2 non-silent point mutations in sbb17 clone 1 and a deletion in sbb17 clone 2, so I needed additional clones of sbb17 sequenced.  Both clone 1 and clone 2 of sbb18 were perfect.   
Sequencing data for the first two clones of both sbb17 and sbb18 came in last week.  I analyzed the data and found 2 non-silent point mutations in sbb17 clone 1 and a deletion in sbb17 clone 2, so I needed additional clones of sbb17 sequenced.  Both clone 1 and clone 2 of sbb18 were perfect.   


Today, additional sequencing data for sbb17 came in.  Both clones 3 and 4 were perfect.
Today, additional sequencing data for sbb17 came in.  Both clones 3 and 4 were perfect.

Latest revision as of 11:03, 3 February 2011

~~!~~

JCAnderson 13:03, 3 February 2011 (EST)

This is my next entry.

JCAnderson 22:54, 31 January 2011 (EST)

Sequencing data for the first two clones of both sbb17 and sbb18 came in last week. I analyzed the data and found 2 non-silent point mutations in sbb17 clone 1 and a deletion in sbb17 clone 2, so I needed additional clones of sbb17 sequenced. Both clone 1 and clone 2 of sbb18 were perfect.

Today, additional sequencing data for sbb17 came in. Both clones 3 and 4 were perfect.