SBPWG:Meetings/April 6 2011: Difference between revisions
(New page: {{SBPWG Temp}} ===Meeting Notes: April 6th 2011 === First Meeting UCSF Mission Bay 6-8pm ====Attendees==== -Megan Palmer (Stanford) <br> -Joseph Jackson (BioCurious) <br> -Danielle Tull...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:53, 16 May 2011
Meeting Notes: April 6th 2011
First Meeting UCSF Mission Bay 6-8pm
Attendees
-Megan Palmer (Stanford)
-Joseph Jackson (BioCurious)
-Danielle Tullman-Ercek (Berkeley)
-Reid Williams (UCSF)
-Ryan Ritterson (UCSF)
-Hanson Lee (Berkeley)
-Marlee Tichenor (Berkeley)
-Josh Wolf (Stanford)
-Mike Fisher (Berkeley)
-Will Carey (IDEO)
-Pablo Schyfter (Stanford)
-Megan Palmer (Stanford)
-Erik Lontok (UCSF)
-Megan Palmer (Stanford)
-Felix Moser (UCSF)
-Robin Prince (UCSF)
-Eli Groban (LS9)
Notes
Megan Palmer's Intro Slides from the Meeting
Brainstorming: What should we do?
- Educate ourselves
- Educate others
- Communications training
- Review new models for public engagement and education (gaming etc)
- Work through case studies in synthetic biology practices and outline lessons learned
- Develop a list of top challenging/open questions in synthetic biology
- Invite in people to give us summaries of the 'state of practices'
* current regulation * the ERC model for developing SB - what is it and why is it appropriate * ownership and sharing * bioethics * history of threatened technologies (examples?)
Next meeting
Breaking down practices by topical area v1
Volunteers from the group pick a topic of interest to brainstorm answers to the following questions
- what's new?
- what's not?
- what's next?
- why does it matter?
Topical areas:
- ownership and innovation (ryan, joseph)
- ethics (marlee)
- communications/education/outreach (danielle) (also hanson?)
- safety (robin)
- security (mike)
- design/philosophy (reid)
- applications (megan)
Point was made that first should first be asking: why do synthetic biology?