Salomon Garcia: Week 4: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added to pics and info) |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
====Activity 2 Part 1==== | ====Activity 2 Part 1==== | ||
*Sequences were generated and this is what is seen: | *Sequences were generated and this is what is seen: | ||
[[Image: | [[Image:Sequence1.jpg|thumb|center|500px|Sequences]] | ||
*A rooted tree was also generated and this is what was shown: | *A rooted tree was also generated and this is what was shown: | ||
[[Image:rootedtree.jpg|thumb|center|500px|Rooted Tree]] | [[Image:rootedtree.jpg|thumb|center|500px|Rooted Tree]] |
Revision as of 21:12, 14 February 2010
Week 4 Entry
Activity 1 Part 1
- Pubmed:
- How did you searh for the PubMed entry?
- What oher ways might you have searched?
- What other types of related information are available?
- I searched for the original paper by typing in the entire title of the research paper into the search box and the window showed the paper that was written in 1998.
- Another way I could have searched for it was by doing an advanced search and using the authors name on the search.
- There were other information that was useful as was the information that described what HIV-1 is.
Activity 1 Part 2
- GenBank:
- What was the accession number of the sequence you chose?
- Which subject of the study was that HIV sequence from? Which section of the record contains information about who the HIV was collected from?
- The accession number was GenBank: AF016760.1.
- This sequence was from subject 1. GenBank and the Fasta both contain where the section of HIV came from.
Activity 1 Part 3
- In this portion of the activity I used 4 of the sequences from the Markham study. I ran a ClustalW with the Biology workbench website. this was the sequence:
- This is a pic of the experimental tree:
Activity 2 Part 1
- Sequences were generated and this is what is seen:
- A rooted tree was also generated and this is what was shown: