Silver: Synthetic Biology Review Article: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User: DavidDrubin | David Drubin]] and [[User: PamSilver | Pam Silver]] are writing an in depth review article on Synthetic Biology for Genes and Development. We would very much like input from the community. Please post any suggestions or papers that you would like us to talk about here. Thanks!<br> | [[User: DavidDrubin | David Drubin]] and [[User: PamSilver | Pam Silver]] are writing an in depth review article on Synthetic Biology for Genes and Development. We would very much like input from the community. Please post any suggestions or papers that you would like us to talk about here. Thanks!<br> | ||
We would like to this to be an in depth review of the field. This is a first attempt at using OWW to write such a review and thereby engage as many as possible - so we would like any input - be it on content or style. | We would like to this to be an in depth review of the field. This is a first attempt at using OWW to write such a review and thereby engage as many as possible - so we would like any input - be it on content or style. At this early stage, we find the input on papers and areas to cover to be very useful. | ||
OUTLINE COMING SOON | |||
These are comments that have been received thus far. | |||
==artificial vesicle based biology== | ==artificial vesicle based biology== |
Revision as of 06:49, 4 July 2006
David Drubin and Pam Silver are writing an in depth review article on Synthetic Biology for Genes and Development. We would very much like input from the community. Please post any suggestions or papers that you would like us to talk about here. Thanks!
We would like to this to be an in depth review of the field. This is a first attempt at using OWW to write such a review and thereby engage as many as possible - so we would like any input - be it on content or style. At this early stage, we find the input on papers and areas to cover to be very useful.
OUTLINE COMING SOON
These are comments that have been received thus far.
artificial vesicle based biology
- Noireaux V, Bar-Ziv R, Godefroy J, Salman H, and Libchaber A. Toward an artificial cell based on gene expression in vesicles. Phys Biol. 2005 Sep 15;2(3):P1-8. DOI:10.1088/1478-3975/2/3/P01 |
- Noireaux V and Libchaber A. A vesicle bioreactor as a step toward an artificial cell assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 21;101(51):17669-74. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0408236101 |
- Chen IA, Roberts RW, and Szostak JW. The emergence of competition between model protocells. Science. 2004 Sep 3;305(5689):1474-6. DOI:10.1126/science.1100757 |
Mathematical or Quantitative (Predictive) Models of Gene Networks
- Tuttle LM, Salis H, Tomshine J, and Kaznessis YN. Model-driven designs of an oscillating gene network. Biophys J. 2005 Dec;89(6):3873-83. DOI:10.1529/biophysj.105.064204 |
materials for teaching undergrads
Beyond iGEM, there are some initial teaching efforts from courses taught at
UC Berkeley [[1]]
and at MIT [[2]] and [[3]]. Some of the MIT material was adapted as iGEM 06 teaching material at BU [[4]] so it didn't take long for the use of even a fledgling curriculum effort to spread.
Hopefully, as Synthetic Biology advances, the research will provide examples and technologies that capture the distinguishing aspects of the field. It would be great if teaching materials could be developed in parallel to rigorously educate a larger number students who might later do this work. Perhaps somewhere in your review there could be an explicit call for curriculum development as well. - Natalie
other ideas
- I think it would be nice to see where Systems Biology meets Synthetic Biology, e.g the use of modeling tools in synthetic biology.