Smolke:Journal Club: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
#han pmid=19135890 | #han pmid=19135890 | ||
#fung pmid=15875027 | #fung pmid=15875027 | ||
#nevozhay pmid=19279212 | |||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
*I found the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> paper extremely disappointing. If you want an example of what not to do, it's a good one. But otherwise I'd skip it. -Josh | *I found the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> paper extremely disappointing. If you want an example of what not to do, it's a good one. But otherwise I'd skip it. -Josh | ||
*I suggested the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> mostly to throw out a paper about synthetic information processing in cells. It is outside my area of familiarity, but I think it could be interesting, especially since that is what the Endy lab is gearing up to attack. So if anyone else has a good recent paper on some synthetic biology approach to information processing, I think that might be cool for us to read and critique. -Mike | *I suggested the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> mostly to throw out a paper about synthetic information processing in cells. It is outside my area of familiarity, but I think it could be interesting, especially since that is what the Endy lab is gearing up to attack. So if anyone else has a good recent paper on some synthetic biology approach to information processing, I think that might be cool for us to read and critique. -Mike | ||
==Voting on Papers== | ==Voting on Papers== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*Paper 5. | *Paper 5. | ||
*Paper 6. Andrew | *Paper 6. Andrew | ||
*Paper 7. | *Paper 7. Josh | ||
==Past Papers== | ==Past Papers== | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 8 April 2009
