Sortostat/Foundry report card: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Chips received 12/12/06 ==  
==Chips received 12/12/06 ==  
*The valves did not seal completely in this batch.  
*The valves did not seal completely in this batch.
[[Image:Sortostat-valves-partialClosed.PNG|thumb|left|200px|example of incomplete sealing]]


==Chips received 4/3/07 ==  
==Chips received 4/3/07 ==  

Revision as of 07:11, 6 June 2007

Chips received 12/12/06

  • The valves did not seal completely in this batch.
example of incomplete sealing

Chips received 4/3/07

  • A - collapsed valves on both reactors (~6 each)
  • B - 1 reactor with collapsed valves (~2) and one without (that seems to be working great so far).
  • C - both reactors didn't have collapsed valves, however 2 of the port holes weren't drilled, so reactors were unusable. (must have gotten missed)

Chips received 5/24/07

  • A1 - push up layer alignment is somewhat off-center, may still be usable
  • A2 - push up layer alignment is somewhat off-center, may still be usable
  • B1 - push up layer alignment is very off-center, UNUSABLE.
  • B2 - looks OK; this is surprising considering the status of B1 (these are on the same chip so shouldn't be very independent if there isn't warping of the layer...)
  • C1 - push up layer alignment somewhat off center (worse than C2), may still be usable (though the sorting chamber doesn't look great so probably not worth using).
  • C2 - push up layer alignment is somewhat off-center, sorting chamber looks OK, likely usable.
  • D1 - looks fine, thought there is a 'dimple' in the feed line on the right hand side of the reactor.
  • D2 - looks very good