Sortostat/Foundry report card: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*The valves did not seal completely in this batch. | *The valves did not seal completely in this batch. | ||
[[Image:Sortostat-valves-partialClosed.PNG|thumb|left|200px|example of incomplete sealing]] | [[Image:Sortostat-valves-partialClosed.PNG|thumb|left|200px|example of incomplete sealing]] | ||
<br style="clear:both" /> | |||
==Chips received 4/3/07 == | ==Chips received 4/3/07 == |
Revision as of 07:12, 6 June 2007
Chips received 12/12/06
- The valves did not seal completely in this batch.
Chips received 4/3/07
- A - collapsed valves on both reactors (~6 each)
- B - 1 reactor with collapsed valves (~2) and one without (that seems to be working great so far).
- C - both reactors didn't have collapsed valves, however 2 of the port holes weren't drilled, so reactors were unusable. (must have gotten missed)
Chips received 5/24/07
- A1 - push up layer alignment is somewhat off-center, may still be usable
- A2 - push up layer alignment is somewhat off-center, may still be usable
- B1 - push up layer alignment is very off-center, UNUSABLE.
- B2 - looks OK; this is surprising considering the status of B1 (these are on the same chip so shouldn't be very independent if there isn't warping of the layer...)
- C1 - push up layer alignment somewhat off center (worse than C2), may still be usable (though the sorting chamber doesn't look great so probably not worth using).
- C2 - push up layer alignment is somewhat off-center, sorting chamber looks OK, likely usable.
- D1 - looks fine, thought there is a 'dimple' in the feed line on the right hand side of the reactor.
- D2 - looks very good