Ssutton: PTL Logic: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Ssutton: 1-23-06|Discussion points from 1-23-06 meeting]]
=='''Introduction'''==
=='''Introduction'''==


I am working to develop a new type of logic, called Post-Translational Logic, or PTL. PTL devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.
I am working to develop a new type of device, called Post-Translational Device, or PTD. PTD devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.


Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are examples of Transcrition-based Logic. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:
Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are examples of Transcription-based Logic. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:




Line 10: Line 12:
*Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
*Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
*Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular ''concentrations'' of proteins.
*Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular ''concentrations'' of proteins.
*Easier to engineer than PTL
*Easier to engineer than PTD
*Slow response time (hours)
*Slow response time (hours)
*Uses one subset of cellular functions
*Uses one subset of cellular functions




'''PTL'''
'''PTD'''
*Engineered around protein modifications  
*Engineered around protein modifications  
*Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
*Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
Line 24: Line 26:




'''In designing PTL logic, I am working to answer the following questions:'''
'''In designing PTDd, I am working to answer the following questions:'''
* What is a PTL part?
* What is a PT part?
* What is a PTL device?
* What is a PT device?
* What signals are passed between devices?
* What signals are passed between devices?
* What are device performance specifications?
* What are device performance specifications?
Line 32: Line 34:
Below I will describe some of my ideas.
Below I will describe some of my ideas.


=='''A Basic PTL System: Kinase-Kinase circuit'''==
=='''A Basic PTD System: Kinase-Kinase circuit'''==


The most intuitive definition of a PTL device is illustrated as follows.
The most intuitive definition of a PTD is illustrated as follows.


[[Image:PTL fig1.JPG|600px|center]]
[[Image:PTL fig1.JPG|600px|center]]


*In this system, each device is essentially a MAP Kinase.  Each device shown here contains the following parts:
*In this system, each device is essentially a MAP Kinase.  Each device shown here contains the following parts:
**<font style="background-color: #00CCFF">Kinase Scaffold</font>
**<font style="background-color: #67CCFF">Kinase Scaffold</font>
**<font style="background-color: #00FF33">Docking Site</font>
**<font style="background-color: #73FC64">Docking Site</font>
**<font style="background-color: #00FF33">PO<sub>4</sub> Site</font>
**<font style="background-color: #73FC64">PO<sub>4</sub> Site</font>
**<font style="background-color: #00FF33">Docking Groove</font>
**<font style="background-color: #73FC64">Docking Groove</font>
**<font style="background-color: #00FF33"> PO<sub>4</sub> Groove</font>
**<font style="background-color: #73FC64"> PO<sub>4</sub> Groove</font>
**<font style="background-color: #00FF33">Catalytic Domain</font>
**<font style="background-color: #73FC64">Catalytic Domain</font>
*The above parts are needed so that one MAP Kinase can recognize another.  MAP Kinases recognize their substrates in two ways:
*The above parts are needed so that one MAP Kinase can recognize another.  MAP Kinases recognize their substrates in two ways:
**The <font style="background-color: #00FF33">Docking Groove</font> of the upstream kinase (e.g. ''Device1'') binds to the <font style="background-color: #00FF33">Docking Site</font> of the downstream kinase (e.g. ''Device2'').
**The <font style="background-color: #73FC64">Docking Groove</font> of the upstream kinase (e.g. ''Device1'') binds to the <font style="background-color: #73FC64">Docking Site</font> of the downstream kinase (e.g. ''Device2'').
**The <font style="background-color: #00FF33"> PO<sub>4</sub> Groove</font> of the upstream kinase binds to the <font style="background-color: #00FF33">PO<sub>4</sub> Site</font> of the downstream kinase.
**The <font style="background-color: #73FC64"> PO<sub>4</sub> Groove</font> of the upstream kinase binds to the <font style="background-color: #73FC64">PO<sub>4</sub> Site</font> of the downstream kinase.
*Once a MAP Kinase <font style="background-color: #00FF33">PO<sub>4</sub> Site</font> has been phosphorylated, the MAP Kinase undergoes a conformational change which positions the <font style="background-color: #00FF33">Catalytic Domain</font> into its active conformation with catalytic activity parameter <font style="color: #FF3300">'''k<sub>cat</sub>'''</font>.
*Once a MAP Kinase <font style="background-color: #73FC64">PO<sub>4</sub> Site</font> has been phosphorylated, the MAP Kinase undergoes a conformational change which positions the <font style="background-color: #73FC64">Catalytic Domain</font> into its active conformation with catalytic activity parameter <font style="color: #FF3300">'''k<sub>cat</sub>'''</font>.
*Devices can be linearly arranges so as to form a cascade:
*Devices can be linearly arranges so as to form a cascade:
**''Device1'' phosphorylates and activates ''Device2''.
**''Device1'' phosphorylates and activates ''Device2''.
Line 66: Line 68:
[[Image:PTL fig3.JPG|600px|center]]
[[Image:PTL fig3.JPG|600px|center]]


[[Image:PTL text3.JPG|500px|center]]
*In this system, each device contains the following parts:
 
** Two halves of a <font style="background-color: #
Device 1 could be added upstream of any other device, and device part would be phosphorylated with maximal rate Vmax1.
 
 
=='''Other types of devices: Localization'''==
 
Phosphorylation controls many intracellular behaviors, including:
* allosteric activation (described by the MAP Kinases above) or inhibition
* translocation
* degradation
* protein complex formation
* other binding events
 
One of the largest challenges facing PTL is finding a signal carrier that can descrbie all of the above functions.
 
 
As an example, let's examine nuclear localization:
 
[[Image:PTL fig4text4.JPG|600px|center]]
 
Thus far, I have shown two useful signal carriers: Vmax and Vnuc. Let's examine how the two signal carriers could be integrated into one circuit.
 
 
=='''Combining Vmax and Vnuc into one circuit'''==
Here is an example of a kinase that modulates the rate of transport of a Protein into the nucleus:
 
[[Image:PTL fig5.JPG|600px|center]]
 
[[Image:PTL text5.JPG|500px|center]]
 
 
We could imagine a circuit in which an input device phosphorylates a downstream device on two Phosphorylation sites, thus resulting in two distinctive output signals:
 
[[Image:PTL fig6.JPG|600px|center]]
 
[[Image:PTL text6.JPG|500px|center]]
 
 
==Other types signals we might want to define and measure==
 
[[Image:PTL text7.JPG|500px|center]]

Latest revision as of 17:30, 12 September 2006

Discussion points from 1-23-06 meeting

Introduction

I am working to develop a new type of device, called Post-Translational Device, or PTD. PTD devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.

Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are examples of Transcription-based Logic. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:


Transcription-based Logic

  • Engineered around gene expression
  • Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
  • Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular concentrations of proteins.
  • Easier to engineer than PTD
  • Slow response time (hours)
  • Uses one subset of cellular functions


PTD

  • Engineered around protein modifications
  • Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
  • Typical signal: rate of modification, resulting in desired state of proteins.
  • More difficult to engineer than Transcription-based logic.
  • Fast response time (seconds)
  • Explores a new set of applications


In designing PTDd, I am working to answer the following questions:

  • What is a PT part?
  • What is a PT device?
  • What signals are passed between devices?
  • What are device performance specifications?

Below I will describe some of my ideas.

A Basic PTD System: Kinase-Kinase circuit

The most intuitive definition of a PTD is illustrated as follows.

  • In this system, each device is essentially a MAP Kinase. Each device shown here contains the following parts:
    • Kinase Scaffold
    • Docking Site
    • PO4 Site
    • Docking Groove
    • PO4 Groove
    • Catalytic Domain
  • The above parts are needed so that one MAP Kinase can recognize another. MAP Kinases recognize their substrates in two ways:
    • The Docking Groove of the upstream kinase (e.g. Device1) binds to the Docking Site of the downstream kinase (e.g. Device2).
    • The PO4 Groove of the upstream kinase binds to the PO4 Site of the downstream kinase.
  • Once a MAP Kinase PO4 Site has been phosphorylated, the MAP Kinase undergoes a conformational change which positions the Catalytic Domain into its active conformation with catalytic activity parameter kcat.
  • Devices can be linearly arranges so as to form a cascade:
    • Device1 phosphorylates and activates Device2.
    • Device2 phosphorylates and activates Device3, etc.
  • The signal passed between devices is some sort of catalytic activity of one kinase for another.


The problem with the above system is that the output of one device can only be received by a device that contains compatible Docking and PO4 parts. The figure below illustrates points of part-part interactions, with red line connecting parts that must be compatibile.


This trans-part compatibility defeats the purpose of a universal signal carrier, and limits the utility and versatility of PTL devices. Note that we encountered the same problem when defining PDL devices and signals.

A solution is to re-draw the device boundaries such that all corresponding parts are within the same devices:

  • In this system, each device contains the following parts:
    • Two halves of a <font style="background-color: #