Stanford/BIOE44:Module 4:Day1: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 69: Line 69:
What are our options.
What are our options.


Here are some imaginary curves to stimulate your thinking.  
Here are some imaginary curves to stimulate your thinking.
[[Image:Imaginary_Curve2.jpg|thumb]]
[[Image:Imaginary_Curve2.jpg|thumb|center]]
[[Image:Imaginary_Curve1.jpg|thumb]]
[[Image:Imaginary_Curve1.jpg|thumb|center]]


===Deconstructing our Device===
===Deconstructing our Device===
[[Image:Deconstruction2.jpg]]
[[Image:Deconstruction2.jpg]]

Revision as of 17:59, 5 May 2010

Moss

Arsenic

Using the Same Language

Please review common symbols for representing your device. http://openwetware.org/wiki/Endy:Notebook/Synthetic_Biology_Open_Language

Current Inventory of Parts

Please enter what you have and indicate the state which it is in.

Part status volume notes contributor
O/P for ars operon cPCR, PCR Cleanup, Digested@EcoR:SpeI, Gel Extract 6ul ~200ng/ul Koshlan
RBS + arsR ORF cPCR, PCR Cleanup, Digested@XbaI:PstI, Gel Extracted 6ul ~80mg/ul (extra codon flanking ATG) Koshlan
O/P + RBS + arsR (Combined like the edinburgh part) cPCR, PCR Cleanup, Digested@EcoR:SpeI, PCR Cleanup 20ul ~40ng/ul questionable quality since no gel extract Koshlan

Design and Testing Goal

We need to think about the fundamental relationship between the amount of pollution in our sample and the reporter strength. What will this relationship look like. How can we alter it? Consider the effect of the following.

  1. copy number
  2. ribosome binding site
  3. ratio of ArsR transcription factor to the operator site
  4. what else

What are our options.

Here are some imaginary curves to stimulate your thinking.

Deconstructing our Device