SynBERC: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
==Working Drafts of Slides for December Site Visit==
==Working Drafts of Slides for December Site Visit==
*Devices and Device Composition – [[User:Endy | Drew Endy]]
*Devices and Device Composition – [[User:Endy | Drew Endy]]
**[20 min. plus 10 min. Q/A]
**Slides via [http://mit.edu/endy/www/scraps/talks/synberc/Endy.SynBERC.v1.ppt PowerPoint]
**20 min. plus 10 min. Q/A
**Questions
**Questions
***Should I include example of utility of hierarchy? [e.g., Polkadorks?]
***Should I include example of utility of hierarchy? [e.g., Polkadorks?]

Revision as of 07:46, 21 November 2005

Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center

Working Drafts of Slides for December Site Visit

  • Devices and Device Composition – Drew Endy
    • Slides via PowerPoint
    • 20 min. plus 10 min. Q/A
    • Questions
      • Should I include example of utility of hierarchy? [e.g., Polkadorks?]
      • Should I include "process flow" meta-strategy slides?
    • Outline
      • Title Slide
      • Abstraction Hierarchy
      • Utility of Hierarchy (allows decoupling, standards, and avoidance / management of complexity)
      • Walk-through of Hierarchy Levels (Parts (reminder), Devices, Applications)
      • (Talking Point) - Devices bridge connection between basic biological functions (parts) and high level applications.
      • Introduce abstraction barriers and intefaces
      • Introduce construction of hierarchy via example 1, from Parts to Devices
      • Introduce issue of standard assembly (TK biobricks assembly scheme v1)
      • Introduce issue / challenge of functional composition (part-part junction)
      • Continue construction of hierarchy via example 2, from Devices to Systems
      • Compare [protein]-based gene-expression devices with PoPS-based devices
      • Detail PoPS and discuss issues (e.g., how do we measure PoPS)?
      • Can we extend abstraction hierarchy to post-translational devices [Get Samantha Sutton's slides here]
      • Explain issues / challenge with PTL abstraction [Wendell, we need to synch. here for sure!]
      • Can we extend abstraction hierarchy to metabolic devices [Kristala, we need to synch here!]
      • Revisit device / system interface, introduce Jason Kelly's operation definition based on ability to directly screen / select for device function, but not system / application function
      • Provide summary of foundational research [e.g., extending abstraction to post-translational devices and metabolic devices, measurement of signal carriers, coupling to genetic screening and selection]
      • Introduce applied research. As in, we will be building the following type of devices. Information Processing, Transducers (from one device family to the next), Receivers, Actuators, Metabolism
      • (~3 slides) Provide examples of devices, detailing interface with Registry (e.g., BBa_F2620)