SynBERC:COG: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


=Meetings=
=Meetings=
==COG:Meeting 1==
*[[SynBERC:COG/October 2007 Meeting]] - TK debrief on QIAcube
Agenda:
**[[SynBERC:COG/Homework]]:  
#What are the goals for COG? What do people want to get out of meetings?
**#What's the cloning amount (and type) per lab ?
#*Is something like the [[SynBERC:COG/Report|report described here]] a good 6 month goal?  Should we be doing something else?
**#What experiment can't we do that we'd like to do?
#How do we want to do de-breifs on projects on-going in the labs?
*[[SynBERC:COG/December 2007 Meeting]] - Lane & Anderson research updates
#*One group each meeting?  Short updates from everyone?
*[[SynBERC:COG/January 2008 Meeting]] - Registry research update
#Meeting frequency?
**[[:Media:SynBERC talk Reisinger.ppt|Sarah Reisinger SynBERC presentation on automated cloning]]
#Next steps
*[[SynBERC:COG/February 2008 Meeting]] - Sergio from the Lim Lab on combinatorial assembly
*[[SynBERC:COG/April 2008 Meeting]] - Harris from the Church lab presents on MAGE


=Communication=
=Communication=

Latest revision as of 12:41, 5 October 2008

Welcome to the Construction Optimization Group (COG)!

At the last SynBERC retreat SynBERCers decided that solving the challenge of automated DNA assembly/cloning would be a priority for the center. COG will be tasked with drafting a report for the upcoming NSF visit in March(?) that evaluates current assembly approaches and proposes a path forward. This page is just getting started, please add/edit!

Goals

  1. Maintain communication across labs on status of automated assembly projects.
  2. Produce a report with evaluation of current assembly approaches and recommendations for going forward.

Meetings

Communication

Members