SynBERC:COG/December 2007 Meeting: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Homework=== | ===Homework=== | ||
*[[SynBERC:COG/Homework|Last week's homework]] | *[[SynBERC:COG/Homework|Last week's homework]] | ||
* | * '''Price-Point and Turn Around Time for a thrid party doing an assembly for you, by any means.''' | ||
*Registry wants to know: | *Registry wants to know: | ||
**Should they be working on automated cloning or not? | **Should they be working on automated cloning or not? | ||
Latest revision as of 14:01, 4 December 2007
Agenda
Updates
- Lane Weaver - solid phase assembly
- John Anderson - conjugation-based assembly
Homework
- Last week's homework
- Price-Point and Turn Around Time for a thrid party doing an assembly for you, by any means.
- Registry wants to know:
- Should they be working on automated cloning or not?
- Specifically, what are the expectations in terms of cost, turn-around time, etc.
- Does everyone think this should be done through a synth company, instead?
Logistics
- Meeting will be 1st (non-holiday) Tuesday of the month at 3pm EST, sound OK? Though that is Jan 1, so next one would be Jan 8th at 3pm. Email me if that doesn't work.
