SynBERC:MIT: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
##RBSs
##RBSs
##Promoters
##Promoters
#'''CHASSIS''': Why do we want different kinds?  What kinds?  What are the simplest systems that work?
#'''CHASSIS''': Why do we want different kinds?  What kinds?  What are the simplest systems that work?
##Minimal chassis
##Mesoplasma florum
##E. coli standard strain and rE. coli
##Yeast
#Synthesis technologies
#Synthesis technologies
##What is state of the art?
##What is state of the art?
Line 37: Line 41:
##Can the fabs constrain what people synthesize?
##Can the fabs constrain what people synthesize?
#What does the CAD tool look like?
#What does the CAD tool look like?
#Human practices
#Human practice
#Differentiation and cell to cell communication.  Development.  Programmed pattern formation.  Arthur LanderRadhika
#Differentiation and cell to cell communication.  Development.  Programmed pattern formation.  (Arthur Lander, Radhika)
#[[Synthetic Biology:BioBricks/Standardization|Standards]] (also see talk page)
#[[Synthetic Biology:BioBricks/Standardization|Standards]] (also see talk page)
#What characteristics are necessary for a standard specification of part/device/system function? i.e. what does the part datasheet look like?
#*What are the important characteristics for a device that catalyzes an enzymatic reaction?
#*What are the important characteristics for a transcription based device?
#**Here is one [[Endy:F2620|proposal]].
#Load issues
#Load issues
#*What demands on the chassis are of most concern to us? Replication, transcription, [[Endy:Translation demand|translation]], Enzyme activity?
#*What demands on the chassis are of most concern to us? Replication, transcription, [[Endy:Translation demand|translation]], Enzyme activity?
Line 51: Line 51:
#Selection against our systems
#Selection against our systems
##e.g. IS elements are showing up in our devices!
##e.g. IS elements are showing up in our devices!
#Standard chassis
#Statistics of codon pairs (UC Irvine folks)
#Statistics of codon pairs
#iGEM 2010
#iGEM 2010
#Registry 2.0
#Registry 2.0
#Publishing (with CS on Oct 20)
#Publishing (with CS on Oct 20)
#Please add your topic to the list.
#Please add your topic to the list.

Revision as of 11:25, 20 September 2006

back to SynBERC on OWW

Lab Video Tours

MIT Lab video tours

Meetings

Proposed topics

Some potential topics to be discussed at MIT SBWG lunch ... just brainstorming ... please edit. (I know that we had talked about having people present but I think there are also a set of issues that several people's projects touch on but aren't being addressed by any one person.) Apologies because these aren't articulated very well.

Topics

  1. Electronics device families (introduction by TK)
  2. Abstraction hierarchies
    1. Parts -> Devices -> Systems
    2. Biological layer model (AC)
  3. DEVICES: Composability? Device family specification? Interfaces within families? Interfaces across families? Eventually parts datasheet? Eventually standards?
    1. Transcriptional device families
    2. Post-translational device families (SS)
    3. Biosynthetic device families (KJP lab)
    4. Ribozyme device families (AC)
    5. Translation device families?
  4. PARTS:
    1. Terminators
    2. Coding regions
    3. RBSs
    4. Promoters
  5. CHASSIS: Why do we want different kinds? What kinds? What are the simplest systems that work?
    1. Minimal chassis
    2. Mesoplasma florum
    3. E. coli standard strain and rE. coli
    4. Yeast
  6. Synthesis technologies
    1. What is state of the art?
    2. What are the good ideas?
    3. How do we get more investment?
    4. Can the fabs constrain what people synthesize?
  7. What does the CAD tool look like?
  8. Human practice
  9. Differentiation and cell to cell communication. Development. Programmed pattern formation. (Arthur Lander, Radhika)
  10. Standards (also see talk page)
  11. Load issues
    • What demands on the chassis are of most concern to us? Replication, transcription, translation, Enzyme activity?
      • Are we regularly placing high demands on the chassis with our existing systems?
    • What chassis responses to an applied demand are of relevance? Growth rate, protein synthesis capacity?
      • Can we specify a threshold demand level above which the chassis response is so severe as to render the our engineered systems inoperable?
  12. Selection against our systems
    1. e.g. IS elements are showing up in our devices!
  13. Statistics of codon pairs (UC Irvine folks)
  14. iGEM 2010
  15. Registry 2.0
  16. Publishing (with CS on Oct 20)
  17. Please add your topic to the list.