SynBERC:Training group/2007 site visit: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Discussion on standards== | ==Discussion on standards== | ||
*Thursday morning | *Thursday morning | ||
Given that we are all getting together, it would likely be useful to discuss standards in synthetic biology. | |||
===Parts=== | ===Parts=== | ||
*Where should part-part junctions be located? | |||
===Devices=== | ===Devices=== | ||
*Under what operating conditions should devices be characterized? | |||
*What are the common signal carriers for | |||
**transcripion-based devices | |||
**translation-based devices | |||
**post-translational devices | |||
===Chassis=== | ===Chassis=== | ||
*What strains of ''E. coli'' should we use? | |||
*What strains of yeast? | |||
*What would an ideal chassis look like? | |||
===Testbed systems=== | ===Testbed systems=== | ||
===Human practice=== | ===Human practice=== | ||
Revision as of 11:41, 13 February 2007
Site visit schedule
Discussion on SynBERC itself
- Wednesday afternoon
We need to give student feedback to NSF regarding SynBERC. This feedback falls into 4 categories listed below.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Discussion on standards
- Thursday morning
Given that we are all getting together, it would likely be useful to discuss standards in synthetic biology.
Parts
- Where should part-part junctions be located?
Devices
- Under what operating conditions should devices be characterized?
- What are the common signal carriers for
- transcripion-based devices
- translation-based devices
- post-translational devices
Chassis
- What strains of E. coli should we use?
- What strains of yeast?
- What would an ideal chassis look like?
