SynBERC:Training group/2007 site visit: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Strengths=== | ===Strengths=== | ||
*What is SynBERC good at? | |||
===Weaknesses=== | ===Weaknesses=== | ||
*What issues does SynBERC need to work on? | |||
===Opportunities=== | ===Opportunities=== | ||
*Where could SynBERC make an impact? | |||
===Threats=== | ===Threats=== | ||
*What problems can you foresee for SynBERC? | |||
==Discussion on standards== | ==Discussion on standards== | ||
Revision as of 11:43, 13 February 2007
Site visit schedule
Discussion on SynBERC itself
- Wednesday afternoon
We need to give student feedback to NSF regarding SynBERC. This feedback falls into 4 categories listed below.
Strengths
- What is SynBERC good at?
Weaknesses
- What issues does SynBERC need to work on?
Opportunities
- Where could SynBERC make an impact?
Threats
- What problems can you foresee for SynBERC?
Discussion on standards
- Thursday morning
Given that we are all getting together, it would likely be useful to discuss standards in synthetic biology.
Parts
- Where should part-part junctions be located?
Devices
- Under what operating conditions should devices be characterized?
- What are the common signal carriers for
- transcripion-based devices
- translation-based devices
- post-translational devices
Chassis
- What strains of E. coli should we use?
- What strains of yeast?
- What would an ideal chassis look like?
