SynBERC:Training group/2007 site visit: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*Thursday morning | *Thursday morning | ||
Given that we are all getting together, it would likely be useful to discuss standards in synthetic biology. | Given that we are all getting together, it would likely be useful to discuss standards in synthetic biology. See [[Synthetic Biology:BioBricks/Standardization|previous discussions on standardization]]. | ||
===Parts=== | ===Parts=== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
===Human practice=== | ===Human practice=== | ||
*Are there any ethical standards specific to synthetic biology to which we should be adhering? | |||
Revision as of 12:01, 13 February 2007
Site visit schedule
Discussion on SynBERC itself
- Wednesday afternoon
We need to give student feedback to NSF regarding SynBERC. This feedback falls into 4 categories listed below.
Strengths
- What is SynBERC good at?
Weaknesses
- What issues does SynBERC need to work on?
Opportunities
- Where could SynBERC make an impact?
Threats
- What problems can you foresee for SynBERC?
Discussion on standards
- Thursday morning
Given that we are all getting together, it would likely be useful to discuss standards in synthetic biology. See previous discussions on standardization.
Parts
- Where should part-part junctions be located?
Devices
- Under what operating conditions should devices be characterized?
- What are the common signal carriers for
- transcripion-based devices
- translation-based devices
- post-translational devices
Chassis
- What strains of E. coli should we use?
- What strains of yeast?
- What would an ideal chassis look like?
Testbed systems
Human practice
- Are there any ethical standards specific to synthetic biology to which we should be adhering?
