TMT To Do List: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Time Sensitive==
==Time Sensitive==
*Email drew about
*#talking to kirsten
*#visiting berkeley
*#setting up meeting (re Plectix)
*Read emails that Roger sent
*Email Vincent


==Wiki==
==Wiki==

Revision as of 11:41, 21 August 2006

Time Sensitive

  • Email drew about
    1. talking to kirsten
    2. visiting berkeley
    3. setting up meeting (re Plectix)
  • Read emails that Roger sent
  • Email Vincent

Wiki

  • add multiplier for membrane interactions
  • Fus3 phosph/dephosph
  • Kss1 phosph/dephosph
  • Kss1 phosph of Ste11, Sst2
  • Scoring scheme for trust in given assumption
  • means of attaching author to assumptions
  • change naming from specific protein (Fus3, Ste7, etc) to protein family (MAPK, MAPKK, etc)
  • Ideas on future management
  • integration with BNG

Jacobian Bugs

  1. Statistics from parameter estimation fails if there are more than 254 data points.
    • john can't duplicate
  2. When running estimation from script, you can't specify which parameter to estimate (parameter number can't be a variable), wheras when running estimation block directly, parameter number can be a variable.
    • not a bug
  3. Parameter sensitivities are not correct when the sequence section has a continue for 0 statement.
    • problem identified - will fix it
  4. Jacobian greatly slows down after ~80 simulations are run from a single script.
    • John can't duplicate
  5. Inconsistency with parameter variance in statistics of estimation report.

Experimental

  • Get reporter working in glass bottom plate
  • Get reporter working in Stimulator
  • Check our microscope camera against molsci's (theirs is Micromax 512BFT)
  • Try using poly-Lys instead of ConA

Paper with Kirsten

  • Look over ultrasensitivity papers
    • what are mechnisms that cause ultrasensitivity, and why isn't pheromone response ultrasensitive
  • Yildirim model
  • Kofahl model
  • What tidbits have I uncovered in model building
    • Ste5 dimerization is sufficient to help explain published data (more detail). Etc
  • Email kirsten about Arkin paper. (model discrimination)
  • mention idea of passing control of wiki to SGD

Other

  • Email Roger re microfluidic flow cytometer.
  • talk to kirsten about thesis committee meeting

Papers

Stimulator paper

  • Femlabs model of flow in chip. Force on cells.
  • In Ste2 knockout and Ste2WT cells, see how long aF-fluorescein (David Drubin) takes to wash in and out of cell wall.
  • Use different pH to dissociate pheromone faster?
  • Hit cells with short (1-10s) dose of pheromone at different doses. What fraction at what concentrations respond and shmoo or express Pprm1-YFP?
  • talk to Jeremy

Time-Dependent Stimulation paper

  • Basis/core: identify time varying input timecourses that increase parameter sensitivity
  • Perform same number of expts with step inputs and with time-varying input -> fit model in each case and compare parameter uncertainty
  • Systematically look at different mutants (aF/Ste2, Sst2 deletion/overexpression, Ste2 overexpression, ...), and use of different potential outputs (if we could directly observe state of G protein then...., if we could measure nucleotide hydrolysis rate...).
  • Examine full pathway and other parts of pathway (MAPK cascade) using potential inputs (Ste11 kinase inhibitor, Fus3 kinase inhibitor), and outputs (Fus3 phosphorylation, Dig2/Ste12 FRET, gene expression).