Talk:BE.109:Bio-material engineering/Sequence analysis: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|XXXXVGXXXXXX | |XXXXVGXXXXXX | ||
|3.5 of pCT-CON | |3.5 of pCT-CON | ||
| | |This sequence has some gold binding ability, however unlike D, the sequence data obtained for this colony is quite poor. As a result, we can not make any definite conclusions on what lead to it's binding. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Green | |Green |
Revision as of 10:54, 16 May 2006
Tuesday/Thursday Lab Sequence Data
team color | candidate number | sequence | relative strength | comments/notes |
Green | A | XXWAPAXXXXXX | 1/18 of pCT-CON | This sequence did not show significant binding ability, although because of the poor sequencing data, we can not make any definite conclusions on the cause of the poor gold binding ability. |
Green | B | XXXXVGXXXXXX | 3.5 of pCT-CON | This sequence has some gold binding ability, however unlike D, the sequence data obtained for this colony is quite poor. As a result, we can not make any definite conclusions on what lead to it's binding. |
Green | C | XXXXXXXXSLFL | .83 of pCT-CON | This sequence did not show significant binding ability, although because of the poor sequencing data, we can not make any definite conclusions on the cause of the poor gold binding ability. |
Green | D | LRXXTXGLSLCR | 7.83 of pCT-CON | Colony D was the only one from which we got some sort of meaningful sequence data from. Luckily, it was also our strongest binder. |
Wednesday/Friday Lab Sequence Data
team color | candidate number | sequence | relative strength | comments/notes | |
HAVE A GREAT SUMMER!!