Talk:BioNumber Of The Month

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (12:11, 18 February 2009) (view source)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== neat analysis ==
== neat analysis ==
-
This is a neat analysis.  In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much is directly converted from reduced NADH/NADPH compounds?  I guess what's the ratio in terms of free energy.  My gut feeling is that they are on the same order, and if they are, it might be a good complementary analysis. :[[User:Skosuri|Skosuri]] 12:11, 18 February 2009 (EST)
+
This is a neat analysis.  In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much is directly converted from reduced NADH/NADPH compounds?  I guess what's the ratio in terms of free energy.  My gut feeling is that they are on the same order, and if they are, it might be a good complementary analysis. --[[User:Skosuri|Skosuri]] 12:11, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Current revision

neat analysis

This is a neat analysis. In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much is directly converted from reduced NADH/NADPH compounds? I guess what's the ratio in terms of free energy. My gut feeling is that they are on the same order, and if they are, it might be a good complementary analysis. --Skosuri 12:11, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Personal tools