Talk:CH391L/S13/Molecular Gastronomy: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 16:43, 22 April 2013 (EDT)''':Your mention of reverse spherification comes before you lay out the term spherification, might want to mention what the normal one is first
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 16:43, 22 April 2013 (EDT)''':Your mention of reverse spherification comes before you lay out the term spherification, might want to mention what the normal one is first
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:00, 22 April 2013 (EDT)''':beat foam should be beEt foam
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 17:00, 22 April 2013 (EDT)''':beat foam should be beEt foam
*'''[[User:Dwight Tyler Fields|Dwight Tyler Fields]] 17:35, 22 April 2013 (EDT)''': The part about knocking out allergies in foods seems incredibly promising and very aligned with the mission of synthetic biology. Could you elaborate on this a bit? Has the technique actually been applied successfully? Where is the field going? Is it just limited to iGEM projects at this point?

Revision as of 14:35, 22 April 2013

  • Kevin Baldridge 16:41, 22 April 2013 (EDT):typo in the introduction or the image caption, one says "Herve This" and the other says "Hert This". I really wish his name was Hurt This...
  • Kevin Baldridge 16:43, 22 April 2013 (EDT):Your mention of reverse spherification comes before you lay out the term spherification, might want to mention what the normal one is first
  • Kevin Baldridge 17:00, 22 April 2013 (EDT):beat foam should be beEt foam
  • Dwight Tyler Fields 17:35, 22 April 2013 (EDT): The part about knocking out allergies in foods seems incredibly promising and very aligned with the mission of synthetic biology. Could you elaborate on this a bit? Has the technique actually been applied successfully? Where is the field going? Is it just limited to iGEM projects at this point?