Talk:Harvard:Biophysics 101/2007/Project: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Are we supposed to alter these outlines as we would envision our final project shaping up?
Are we supposed to alter these outlines as we would envision our final project shaping up?
::Yes.  --[[User:ShawnDouglas|smd]] 01:51, 25 February 2007 (EST)
::Yes.  --[[User:ShawnDouglas|smd]] 01:51, 25 February 2007 (EST)
In class on Tuesday, we talked extensively about personal genomes and data that are available to us now.  In class last Thursday, it appeared that should consider how anticipate the new wave of personal genomes that will come as the technology becomes cheaper.  Does anyone have ideas about how we can interface our two data sources?  I personally think we should write a script to anticipate the future wave of data, but can also tolerate what we have now.  That is, we should optimize our program for future datasets, rather than trying to squeeze more than is feasible from HapMap or HGP.  That's not to say we shouldn't analyze these data, but we do need to prioritize...  [[User:ChristopherNabel|CSN]] 01:41, 28 February 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 11:42, 28 February 2007

Are we supposed to alter these outlines as we would envision our final project shaping up?

Yes. --smd 01:51, 25 February 2007 (EST)

In class on Tuesday, we talked extensively about personal genomes and data that are available to us now. In class last Thursday, it appeared that should consider how anticipate the new wave of personal genomes that will come as the technology becomes cheaper. Does anyone have ideas about how we can interface our two data sources? I personally think we should write a script to anticipate the future wave of data, but can also tolerate what we have now. That is, we should optimize our program for future datasets, rather than trying to squeeze more than is feasible from HapMap or HGP. That's not to say we shouldn't analyze these data, but we do need to prioritize... CSN 01:41, 28 February 2007 (EST)