Talk:IGEM:MIT/2006/Communications: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#BBa_J45900 needs to be entered into the Registry | #BBa_J45900 needs to be entered into the Registry | ||
#Does <bbpart>BBa_J45017</bbpart> still have the PstI site or has it been mutated out? If it has been mutated out, then the Registry needs to be updated. | #Does <bbpart>BBa_J45017</bbpart> still have the PstI site or has it been mutated out? If it has been mutated out, then the Registry needs to be updated. | ||
#Update the sequence of <bbpart>BBa_J45009</bbpart> to reflect the fact that BioBrick sites weren't eliminated. | |||
Revision as of 10:01, 5 February 2008
Questions for Stephen
- Did you use the Knight or Endy site directed mutagenesis protocol? (http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:MIT/2006/Notebook/2006-8-10#Mutagenesis says Knight but you told me Endy)
- A: We used the Knight protocol.
- Quantification of banana timecourse
- A: I sent both Alex and Amy an email today about a meeting tomorrow.
- You might want to do some background research on quantification of GC data.
- A: I sent both Alex and Amy an email today about a meeting tomorrow.
- BBa_J45900 needs to be entered into the Registry
- Does <bbpart>BBa_J45017</bbpart> still have the PstI site or has it been mutated out? If it has been mutated out, then the Registry needs to be updated.
- Update the sequence of <bbpart>BBa_J45009</bbpart> to reflect the fact that BioBrick sites weren't eliminated.
