Talk:IGEM:MIT/2006/Communications: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==General outstanding issues== | ==General outstanding issues== | ||
*Funding sources for each person | *Funding sources for each person | ||
*Protocol for transformation | |||
*Define RPM | |||
Revision as of 15:48, 10 February 2008
Questions for Stephen
- Did you use the Knight or Endy site directed mutagenesis protocol? (http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:MIT/2006/Notebook/2006-8-10#Mutagenesis says Knight but you told me Endy)
- A: We used the Knight protocol.
- Then are you sure that you phosphorylated the primers? The Knight protocol doesn't call for this step.
- A: We used the Knight protocol.
- Do we have the regulated wintergreen GC data in a form that we could generate plots similar to the banana timecourse?
General outstanding issues
- Funding sources for each person
- Protocol for transformation
- Define RPM
