Talk:Main Page v2 - Revision history

Skosuri: /* Ready to go? */

Skosuri — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:02:20 GMT

Ready to go?

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 24 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Ready to go?==		==Ready to go?==
		+	'''ITS BEEN MOVED''': Seems like everyone so far was in favor. People can still vote below and we'll take it down if necessary.
		+
	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I think we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.		'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I think we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.
	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]], [[User:Rshetty\|RS]]		*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]], [[User:Rshetty\|RS]]

Reshma P. Shetty: /* Ready to go? */

Reshma P. Shetty — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:29:19 GMT

Ready to go?

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 23 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Ready to go?==		==Ready to go?==
	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I think we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.		'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I think we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.
-	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]]	+	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]], [[User:Rshetty\|RS]]
	*Neah:		*Neah:

Skosuri: /* Ready to go? */

Skosuri — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:18:49 GMT

Ready to go?

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 23 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Ready to go?==		==Ready to go?==
-	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I ~~was~~ we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.	+	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I think we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.
	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]]		*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]]
	*Neah:		*Neah:

Jason R. Kelly: /* Ready to go? */

Jason R. Kelly — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:14:53 GMT

Ready to go?

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 23 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Ready to go?==		==Ready to go?==
	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I was we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.		'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I was we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.
-	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]]	+	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]],[[Jason Kelly\|JK]]
	*Neah:		*Neah:

Barry Canton: /* Ready to go? */

Barry Canton — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:11:11 GMT

Ready to go?

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 23 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Ready to go?==		==Ready to go?==
	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I was we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.		'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I was we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.
-	*Yeah:	+	*Yeah:[[Barry Canton\|BC]]
	*Neah:		*Neah:
-

	==To be fixed==		==To be fixed==

Skosuri at 23:07, 23 March 2006

Skosuri — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:07:46 GMT

←Older revision	Revision as of 23:07, 23 March 2006
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	==Ready to go?==
	+	'''[[User:Skosuri\|Sri Kosuri]] 18:07, 23 March 2006 (EST)''': I was we take this live. I personally would want some small changes, but I think it is pretty much good to go. We can make changes in the future. Also, I don't think it's worth spending a lot more time on... There are much bigger fish to fry in terms of content. I'll put this up tonight or tomorrow, if there are enough responses.
	+	*Yeah:
	+	*Neah:

Austin J. Che: /* Requested pages */

Austin J. Che — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:08:27 GMT

Requested pages

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 23 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==Requested pages==~~	+
-	*'''[[User:Kathmc\|Kathleen]] 16:43, 22 March 2006 (EST)''':Is there any way to separate out lab-/group-specific pages from more general pages in the [[Special:Wantedpages\|Requested Pages]] section? I worry that if people use this to request a protocol or other general info that their request will get lost in the list of user pages and lab-specific pages that haven't been filled in yet.	+
-	**'''[[User:Jgritton\|Jgritton]] 18:14, 22 March 2006 (EST):'''I think that page is auto-generated and just lists the pages with the most links that are empty. You're right they are almost all lab specific and not very useful to a general user. Perhaps we should link to a hand curated page instead.	+

	==To be fixed==		==To be fixed==

Jgritton: /* Requested pages */

Jgritton — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:14:48 GMT

Requested pages

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 22 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Requested pages==		==Requested pages==
	*'''[[User:Kathmc\|Kathleen]] 16:43, 22 March 2006 (EST)''':Is there any way to separate out lab-/group-specific pages from more general pages in the [[Special:Wantedpages\|Requested Pages]] section? I worry that if people use this to request a protocol or other general info that their request will get lost in the list of user pages and lab-specific pages that haven't been filled in yet.		*'''[[User:Kathmc\|Kathleen]] 16:43, 22 March 2006 (EST)''':Is there any way to separate out lab-/group-specific pages from more general pages in the [[Special:Wantedpages\|Requested Pages]] section? I worry that if people use this to request a protocol or other general info that their request will get lost in the list of user pages and lab-specific pages that haven't been filled in yet.
-	**'''[[User:Jgritton\|Jgritton]] 17:02, 22 March 2006 (EST):'''I think that page is auto-generated and just lists the pages with the most links that are empty. You're right they are almost all lab specific and not very useful to a general user. Perhaps we should link to a hand curated page instead.	+	**'''[[User:Jgritton\|Jgritton]] 18:14, 22 March 2006 (EST):'''I think that page is auto-generated and just lists the pages with the most links that are empty. You're right they are almost all lab specific and not very useful to a general user. Perhaps we should link to a hand curated page instead.

	==To be fixed==		==To be fixed==

Jgritton: /* Requested pages */

Jgritton — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:02:17 GMT

Requested pages

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 22 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Requested pages==		==Requested pages==
	*'''[[User:Kathmc\|Kathleen]] 16:43, 22 March 2006 (EST)''':Is there any way to separate out lab-/group-specific pages from more general pages in the [[Special:Wantedpages\|Requested Pages]] section? I worry that if people use this to request a protocol or other general info that their request will get lost in the list of user pages and lab-specific pages that haven't been filled in yet.		*'''[[User:Kathmc\|Kathleen]] 16:43, 22 March 2006 (EST)''':Is there any way to separate out lab-/group-specific pages from more general pages in the [[Special:Wantedpages\|Requested Pages]] section? I worry that if people use this to request a protocol or other general info that their request will get lost in the list of user pages and lab-specific pages that haven't been filled in yet.
		+	**'''[[User:Jgritton\|Jgritton]] 17:02, 22 March 2006 (EST):'''I think that page is auto-generated and just lists the pages with the most links that are empty. You're right they are almost all lab specific and not very useful to a general user. Perhaps we should link to a hand curated page instead.
		+
	==To be fixed==		==To be fixed==
	If we do want to go with something like this new page (need more people to chime in on this). There are several things that needs to be fixed.		If we do want to go with something like this new page (need more people to chime in on this). There are several things that needs to be fixed.

Kathmc at 21:43, 22 March 2006

Kathmc — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:43:21 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 22 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Requested pages==
		+	*'''[[User:Kathmc\|Kathleen]] 16:43, 22 March 2006 (EST)''':Is there any way to separate out lab-/group-specific pages from more general pages in the [[Special:Wantedpages\|Requested Pages]] section? I worry that if people use this to request a protocol or other general info that their request will get lost in the list of user pages and lab-specific pages that haven't been filled in yet.
	==To be fixed==		==To be fixed==
	If we do want to go with something like this new page (need more people to chime in on this). There are several things that needs to be fixed.		If we do want to go with something like this new page (need more people to chime in on this). There are several things that needs to be fixed.