Talk:Reviews:Directed evolution/Library construction: Difference between revisions
(General comments and todo list) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
===Science and updating=== | ===Science and updating=== | ||
Several areas need work to bring this up to date. If anyone has some particular references that they feel should be included it would be helpful to categorise them below. | Several areas need work to bring this up to date. If anyone has some particular references that they feel should be included it would be helpful to categorise them below. General criteria is that they need to give a good description of the methodology and any practical issues as well as apply it to a real experiment. | ||
====In vivo error prone methods==== | ====In vivo error prone methods==== | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
====Random incorporation/deletion methods==== | ====Random incorporation/deletion methods==== | ||
Quite a lot to be done here. Need a new picture for this class. | |||
http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/9/e80 | http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/9/e80 | ||
====Recombination methods==== | ====Recombination methods==== | ||
http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/13/e117 | http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/13/e117 |
Revision as of 08:50, 5 April 2007
General Comments
This is adapated more or less directly from the original text. The major modification is that Figure 2 has been removed as this was adapated from a paper in Nature Biotech. I could check up on the copyright issues but as this is a part of the review that needs modifications anyway I probably won't bother.
Todo List
Good place to list the things that need to be done on this review.
General presentation and logistics
References need to be converted to biblio format. Probably a good opportunity to think about Reference formats. What is the best place for them (separate page, bottom of same page?).
Email appropriate editor at NAR to enquire about writing a short paper to get a primary citation for the WikiReview.
Contact some directed evolution people to help out with curation.
Other issues?
Science and updating
Several areas need work to bring this up to date. If anyone has some particular references that they feel should be included it would be helpful to categorise them below. General criteria is that they need to give a good description of the methodology and any practical issues as well as apply it to a real experiment.
In vivo error prone methods
Error-prone PCR methods
Random incorporation/deletion methods
Quite a lot to be done here. Need a new picture for this class.
http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/9/e80