Talk:Reviews:Synthetic biology: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(pdf version)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== pdf version ==
*'''[[User:Marcel Quint|MQ]] 08:02, 24 April 2008:''' what about a downloadable pdf version of the current version?
==Clear Structure==
==Clear Structure==
*'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 04:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT):'''IF we expect people to add to reviews themselves there's going to have to be a very clear structure where they feel like they can quickly figure out the right place to add their new information.  Should think about the best way to do this...
*'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 04:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT):'''IF we expect people to add to reviews themselves there's going to have to be a very clear structure where they feel like they can quickly figure out the right place to add their new information.  Should think about the best way to do this...
Line 8: Line 11:
*'''[[User:Rshetty|Reshma]] 11:05, 2 April 2007 (EDT)''': Why is this page called OpenWetWare:Reviews/Synthetic biology?  Shouldn't it just be called [[Reviews/Synthetic biology]] or [[Reviews:Synthetic biology]]?  Usually the OpenWetWare prefix is only used for pages pertaining to the site itself.
*'''[[User:Rshetty|Reshma]] 11:05, 2 April 2007 (EDT)''': Why is this page called OpenWetWare:Reviews/Synthetic biology?  Shouldn't it just be called [[Reviews/Synthetic biology]] or [[Reviews:Synthetic biology]]?  Usually the OpenWetWare prefix is only used for pages pertaining to the site itself.
**Yeah,good point.  should probably move all OpenWetWare:Reviews to [[Reviews]]
**Yeah,good point.  should probably move all OpenWetWare:Reviews to [[Reviews]]
== pdf version ==
what about a downloadable pdf version of the current version?

Latest revision as of 23:06, 23 April 2008

pdf version

  • MQ 08:02, 24 April 2008: what about a downloadable pdf version of the current version?

Clear Structure

  • Jasonk 04:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT):IF we expect people to add to reviews themselves there's going to have to be a very clear structure where they feel like they can quickly figure out the right place to add their new information. Should think about the best way to do this...

Figure 1

  • Jasonk 04:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT):Don't really like that figure very much. If anyone has something better, go for it.

Comments

  • Reshma 11:05, 2 April 2007 (EDT): Why is this page called OpenWetWare:Reviews/Synthetic biology? Shouldn't it just be called Reviews/Synthetic biology or Reviews:Synthetic biology? Usually the OpenWetWare prefix is only used for pages pertaining to the site itself.
    • Yeah,good point. should probably move all OpenWetWare:Reviews to Reviews