Talk:Reviews:Synthetic biology: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== pdf version ==
*'''[[User:Marcel Quint|MQ]] 08:02, 24 April 2008:''' what about a downloadable pdf version of the current version?
==Clear Structure==
==Clear Structure==
*'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 04:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT):'''IF we expect people to add to reviews themselves there's going to have to be a very clear structure where they feel like they can quickly figure out the right place to add their new information.  Should think about the best way to do this...
*'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 04:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT):'''IF we expect people to add to reviews themselves there's going to have to be a very clear structure where they feel like they can quickly figure out the right place to add their new information.  Should think about the best way to do this...

Latest revision as of 23:06, 23 April 2008

pdf version

  • MQ 08:02, 24 April 2008: what about a downloadable pdf version of the current version?

Clear Structure

  • Jasonk 04:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT):IF we expect people to add to reviews themselves there's going to have to be a very clear structure where they feel like they can quickly figure out the right place to add their new information. Should think about the best way to do this...

Figure 1

  • Jasonk 04:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT):Don't really like that figure very much. If anyone has something better, go for it.

Comments

  • Reshma 11:05, 2 April 2007 (EDT): Why is this page called OpenWetWare:Reviews/Synthetic biology? Shouldn't it just be called Reviews/Synthetic biology or Reviews:Synthetic biology? Usually the OpenWetWare prefix is only used for pages pertaining to the site itself.
    • Yeah,good point. should probably move all OpenWetWare:Reviews to Reviews