Template:ASUBME100 f2016 L6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: {|{{table}} width="800" |- |style="background-color: #EEE"|128px<span style="font-size:22px;"> BME 100 Fall 2016</span> |style="background-color: #F2F2F2" | ...)
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
=OUR COMPANY=
{| style="wikitable" width="700px"
|- valign="top"
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: student]]
|}
'''Our Brand Name'''
<!-- Instructions: add the name of your team's brand name here -->
=LAB 6 WRITE-UP=
==Bayesian Statistics==
'''Overview of the Original Diagnosis System'''
<!-- Instructions: Write a medium-length summary (~10 - 20 sentences) of how BME100 tested patients for the disease-associated SNP. Describe (A) the division of labor (e.g., 17 teams of 6 students each diagnosed 34 patients total...etc.), (B) things that were done to prevent error, such as the number of replicates per patient, PCR controls, ImageJ calibration controls, and the number of drop images that were used for the ImageJ calculations (per unique PCR sample), and (C) the class's final data from the BME100_Fa2015_PCRresults spreadsheet (successful conclusions, inconclusive results, blank data). Also, if applicable, discuss any challenges or problems you encountered that may have affected your data. -->
'''What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach'''
<!-- Instructions: In your own words, discuss what the results for calculations 1 and 2 imply about the reliability of the individual PCR replicates for concluding that a person has the disease SNP or not. Please do NOT type the actual numerical values here. Just refer to the Bayes values in general terms (for example, "close to 1.00 (100%)", "about 50%", "very small", etc.). -->
<!-- Instructions: In your own words, discuss what the results for calculations 3 and 4 imply about the reliability of PCR for *predicting the development of the disease* (diagnosis). Please do NOT type the actual numerical values here. Just refer to the Bayes values in general terms (for example, "close to 1.00 (100%)", "about 50%", "very small", etc.). -->
<!-- Instructions: Discuss three possible sources of human or machine/device error that could have occurred during the PCR & detection steps that could have affected the Bayes values in a negative way. -->
==Intro to Computer-Aided Design==
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>
<!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (four to ten sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab. If you have had any experience with Solid Works you may compare TinkerCAD to Solid Works in your summary. If not, do not include any discussion about Solid Works. -->
'''Our Design'''<br>
<!-- Instructions: Show an image of your TinkerCAD design here. -->
<!-- Instructions: Under the image, describe your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br>
<br>
==Feature 1: Consumables==
<!-- Instructions: "Consumables" is a term that biotech professionals and scientists use to describe non-machine supplies such as liquid  items like reagents (PCR mix, primer solution, SYBR Green solution, buffer, etc.), plastic tubes, glass slides, etc. Many kits that are on the market include a few *very important* consumables (you can't include everything or else the box would be too large). What does *very important* mean? For instance, if your product includes a re-designed PCR machine with a different heating block that will not fit standard tubes, you may want to include tubes that are manufactured by your company. Summarize which consumables will be packaged in your kit. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look awesome and easy to score. -->
<!-- OPTIONAL: IF your consumables packaging plan addresses any major weakness(es), explain how in an additional paragraph. -->
==Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter==
<!-- Instructions: Summarize how you will include the Open PCR machine and the fluorimeter in your system. If either or both of these is being excluded, explain why and how your design will utilize a new type of hardware. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look really awesome and easy to score. -->
<!-- Instructions: IF your group has decided to redesign the PCR machine and/or Fluorimeter to address any major weakness(es), explain how in an additional paragraph(s). -->
<!-- Do not edit below this line -->
|}

Revision as of 17:30, 10 October 2016

BME 100 Fall 2016 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR COMPANY

Name: student
Name: student
Name: student
Name: student
Name: student
Name: student

Our Brand Name


LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Bayesian Statistics

Overview of the Original Diagnosis System


What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach



Intro to Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD


Our Design





Feature 1: Consumables

Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter