Todd:Journal Impact Factors: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Matthew Todd (talk | contribs) (added first batch of IFs) |
Matthew Todd (talk | contribs) (added a few more) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br> | Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br> | ||
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br> | Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br> | ||
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33<br> | |||
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br> | J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br> | ||
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21<br> | |||
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br> | J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br> | ||
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09<br> | |||
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93<br> | |||
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br> | Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br> | ||
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41<br> | |||
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69<br> | |||
I know there are no links to prove the numbers above. |
Revision as of 19:59, 6 February 2012
When writing grants in Australia it is obligatory to talk about journal impact factors. A relevant list: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73 I know there are no links to prove the numbers above. |