Todd:Journal Impact Factors: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added first batch of IFs)
 
(added a few more)
Line 9: Line 9:
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br>
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br>
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br>
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br>
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33<br>
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br>
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br>
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21<br>
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br>
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br>
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09<br>
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93<br>
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br>
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br>
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41<br>
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69<br>
I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.

Revision as of 19:59, 6 February 2012

Home        Contact        Internal        People        Papers        Research        Teaching        Links        News        Construction       


When writing grants in Australia it is obligatory to talk about journal impact factors. A relevant list:

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69

I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.